Export limit exceeded: 339475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 20907 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 24693 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (24693 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1628 | 1 Juniper | 2 Ex4300, Junos | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS uses the 128.0.0.0/2 subnet for internal communications between the RE and PFEs. It was discovered that packets utilizing these IP addresses may egress an EX4300 switch, leaking configuration information such as heartbeats, kernel versions, etc. out to the Internet, leading to an information exposure vulnerability. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D53 on EX4300; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S6 on EX4300; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D200, 15.1X49-D210 on EX4300; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S7 on EX4300; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S11, 17.1R3-S2 on EX4300; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S3 on EX4300; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2-S5, 17.3R3-S7 on EX4300; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S9, 17.4R3 on EX4300; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S8 on EX4300; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S2 on EX4300; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S3, 18.3R3, 18.3R3-S1 on EX4300; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S5, 18.4R2-S3, 18.4R3 on EX4300; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S4, 19.1R2 on EX4300; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S4, 19.2R2 on EX4300; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R1-S1, 19.3R2 on EX4300. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1619 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2024-11-21 | 6 Medium |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability in Juniper Networks QFX10K Series, EX9200 Series, MX Series, and PTX Series with Next-Generation Routing Engine (NG-RE), allows a local authenticated high privileged user to access the underlying WRL host. This issue only affects QFX10K Series with NG-RE, EX9200 Series with NG-RE, MX Series with NG-RE and PTX Series with NG-RE; which uses vmhost. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S6; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S11; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S11, 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R1-S9, 17.2R3-S3; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2-S5, 17.3R3-S7; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S7, 17.4R3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S4; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D50; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2. To identify whether the device has NG-RE with vmhost, customer can run the following command: > show vmhost status Compute cluster: rainier-re-cc Compute Node: rainier-re-cn, Online If the "show vmhost status" is not supported, then the device does not have NG-RE with vmhost. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1355 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Font Driver Host improperly handles memory.An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability would gain execution on a victim system.The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Windows Font Driver Host handles memory., aka 'Windows Font Driver Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1286 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka 'Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1239 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Media Foundation Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1238. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1195 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) when the Feedback extension improperly validates input, aka 'Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1173 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Power Bi Report Server | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Power BI Report Server in the way it validates the content-type of uploaded attachments, aka 'Microsoft Power BI Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1108 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 17 .net, .net Core, .net Framework and 14 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when .NET Core or .NET Framework improperly handles web requests, aka '.NET Core & .NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1084 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| A Denial Of Service vulnerability exists when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service fails to validate certain function values.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could deny dependent security feature functionality.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application.The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service validates certain function values., aka 'Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1123. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1081 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Printer Service improperly validates file paths while loading printer drivers, aka 'Windows Printer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1043 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1042 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1043. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1041 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1036 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1032 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 Critical |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1026 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Research Javascript Cryptography Library | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Security Feature Bypass vulnerability exists in the MSR JavaScript Cryptography Library that is caused by multiple bugs in the library’s Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) implementation.An attacker could potentially abuse these bugs to learn information about a server’s private ECC key (a key leakage attack) or craft an invalid ECDSA signature that nevertheless passes as valid.The security update addresses the vulnerability by fixing the bugs disclosed in the ECC implementation, aka 'MSR JavaScript Cryptography Library Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1018 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Dynamics 365 Business Central, Dynamics Nav | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists when Microsoft Dynamics Business Central/NAV on-premise does not properly hide the value of a masked field when showing the records as a chart page.The attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could see the information that are in a masked field.The security update addresses the vulnerability by updating the rendering engine the Windows client to properly detect masked fields and render the content as masked., aka 'Microsoft Dynamics Business Central/NAV Information Disclosure'. | ||||
| CVE-2020-19363 | 1 Vtiger | 1 Vtiger Crm | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vtiger CRM v7.2.0 allows an attacker to display hidden files, list directories by using /libraries and /layout directories. | ||||
| CVE-2020-19275 | 1 Dhcms Project | 1 Dhcms | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An Information Disclosure vulnerability exists in dhcms 2017-09-18 when entering invalid characters after the normal interface, which causes an error that will leak the physical path. | ||||
| CVE-2020-18685 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Floodlight | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Floodlight through 1.2 has poor input validation in checkFlow in StaticFlowEntryPusherResource.java because of unchecked prerequisites related to TCP or UDP ports, or group or table IDs. | ||||