Export limit exceeded: 46986 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (46986 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-50710 | 1 Frappe | 2 Framework, Frappe Framework | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Frappe Framework version 17.0.0-dev due to unsafe evaluation of user-controlled data in the Number Card component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50700 | 1 Frappe | 2 Framework, Frappe Framework | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Frappe Framework version 17.0.0-dev due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input in the frappe.get_avatar function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50708 | 1 Frappe | 2 Framework, Frappe Framework | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Frappe Framework version 17.0.0-dev due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input in the MultiSelectDialog component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56317 | 1 Nuxt | 1 Nuxt | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| Nuxt before 4.4.7 (and the 3.x branch before 3.21.7) contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the NoScript component that writes slot content to innerHTML without escaping. Attackers can inject malicious scripts through untrusted data in NoScript slots, such as route.query parameters, which execute in the document context when the noscript tag is implicitly closed by script tags. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50698 | 1 Frappe | 2 Framework, Frappe Framework | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Frappe Framework version 17.0.0-dev due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input before generating HTML output in the Audit Trail component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50699 | 1 Frappe | 2 Framework, Frappe Framework | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Frappe Framework version 17.0.0-dev. An authenticated attacker with write access to Auto Repeat can persist HTML/JavaScript in reference_document using a whitelisted write path and trigger script execution when users open the affected Auto Repeat form. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10531 | 2 Ai Share And Summarize, Wordpress | 2 Ai Share And Summarize, Wordpress | 2026-06-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| The AI Share & Summarize WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 does not sanitise and escape some of its shortcode attributes before outputting them in a page, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56381 | 2 Craftcms, Juzaweb | 2 Craftcms, Cms | 2026-06-24 | 4.8 Medium |
| Craft CMS from version 5.0.0-RC1 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the User Permissions page where user group names are rendered without proper HTML escaping. Attackers with admin access can inject arbitrary JavaScript via the user group name field that executes when other users view or edit permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56383 | 2 Craftcms, Juzaweb | 2 Craftcms, Cms | 2026-06-24 | 4.8 Medium |
| Craft CMS contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the editableTable.twig component when using the 'Row Heading' column type. The application fails to sanitize input within row heading default values, allowing an attacker with an administrator account (with allowAdminChanges enabled) to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when another user views a page containing the affected table field. Affected versions are >= 4.5.0-beta.1 through 4.16.18 and >= 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.8.22; fixed in 4.16.19 and 5.8.23. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56393 | 2 Craftcms, Juzaweb | 2 Craftcms, Cms | 2026-06-24 | 4.8 Medium |
| Craft CMS 4.x (>= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1) and 5.x (>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1) contain multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities where settings names and field option labels are rendered without sanitization (e.g., via the checkbox.twig template, which used {{ label|raw }}). An authenticated administrator (with allowAdminChanges enabled) can inject malicious payloads into section names, volume names, user group names, global set names, generated field names, checkbox/radio option labels, and custom source labels, causing arbitrary JavaScript to execute in other users' control-panel sessions. Fixed in 4.17.0-beta.1 and 5.9.0-beta.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44727 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyter Server | 2026-06-24 | 9.0 Critical |
| Jupyter Server is the backend for Jupyter web applications. Prior to 2.20, the nbconvert HTTP handlers in jupyter_server render user-authored notebook HTML under the Jupyter origin without a sandbox directive in their Content-Security-Policy. Combined with nbconvert.HTMLExporter's default non-sanitizing behavior, a notebook carrying an HTML payload in a display_data output triggers stored XSS with cookie access, full /api/* authority, and kernel RCE. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.20. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8172 | 2 Wordpress, Wpkube | 2 Wordpress, Simple Basic Contact Form | 2026-06-24 | 7.1 High |
| The Simple Basic Contact Form WordPress plugin through 20250114 does not escape user-supplied input before reflecting it into the contact form output on validation errors, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability that unauthenticated attackers can exploit against site visitors via a crafted link or cross-site form submission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54326 | 1 Earendil-works | 1 Pi | 2026-06-24 | 2.5 Low |
| Pi is a minimal terminal coding harness. From 0.74.0 until 0.78.1, Pi HTML exports render session Markdown into a static HTML file. It did not consistently reject unsafe Markdown link and image URL schemes. In versions with scheme filtering, C0 control characters in the URL scheme could bypass the check because browsers normalize those characters before navigation. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.78.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12163 | 1 Fortra | 1 File Integrity Monitoring (fim) | 2026-06-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0.1 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Asset View UI component. An authenticated user with sufficient privileges to create or modify affected node or database configuration fields could store script content that may be rendered as HTML instead of safely escaped text when the affected Asset View UI content is displayed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3652 | 2 Codecanyon, Wordpress | 2 Arforms, Wordpress | 2026-06-24 | 7.2 High |
| The ARForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `value` parameter of the `arf_save_incomplete_form_data` AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 7.1.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that will execute whenever an administrator views the "Partial Filled Form Entries" page in the ARForms dashboard. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8628 | 2 Owencutajar, Wordpress | 2 Entredroppers, Wordpress | 2026-06-24 | 6.1 Medium |
| The EntreDroppers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via PHP_SELF Parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The payload is delivered via attacker-controlled path-info in the URL (e.g., /wp-admin/admin.php/"><script>alert(0)</script>/?page=EntreDroppers.php), which PHP_SELF reflects directly into the form action attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56358 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-06-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| n8n before 1.123.25 (1.x) and before 2.11.2 (2.x), with the fix also included in 2.12.0, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Form Trigger node's CSS sanitization that allows authenticated users to inject malicious scripts. Attackers with workflow creation permissions can inject XSS payloads that execute persistently for all form visitors, enabling form hijacking and phishing attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54303 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.24.0, an endpoint in the Meta and Microsoft Teams trigger nodes reflects a query parameter into the HTTP response without sanitization or Content-Security-Policy headers, enabling reflected XSS in the n8n origin when a logged-in user visits a crafted URL. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.24.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54301 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2, an authenticated user with workflow edit access could configure a Respond to Webhook node to serve binary content with an attacker-controlled Content-Type. The binary response path bypassed the central Content-Security-Policy sandbox header, allowing a public webhook to execute JavaScript in the n8n origin when visited by an authenticated user, with access to that user's session. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54302 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-06-24 | N/A |
| n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2, an authenticated user with workflow edit access could inject arbitrary JavaScript into the Chat Trigger's generated page by setting a malicious webhookId. When a logged-in user visited the chat URL, the injected code executed in the n8n origin with that user's session privileges. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.123.55, 2.25.7, and 2.26.2. | ||||