Export limit exceeded: 363680 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 363680 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363680 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-57356 | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in MC Woocommerce Wishlist <= 1.9.19 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59101 | 1 Estrellaxd | 1 Auto Bangumi | 2026-07-02 | 5.8 Medium |
| AutoBangumi before 3.2.8 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services by supplying arbitrary host values to an unprotected setup endpoint. Attackers can send requests to the POST /api/v1/setup/test-downloader endpoint during the initial setup window, causing the server to issue HTTP GET requests to internal or reserved addresses and leak information through echoed connection-error messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57343 | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Real Estate 7 <= 3.5.9 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27433 | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Motors <= 5.6.80 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13252 | 2 Themeisle, Wordpress | 2 Rss Aggregator By Feedzy – Feed To Post, Autoblogging, News & Youtube Video Feeds Aggregator, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| The RSS Aggregator by Feedzy – Feed to Post, Autoblogging, News & YouTube Video Feeds Aggregator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'aspectRatio' Attribute in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13357 | 2026-07-02 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| The Houzez Property Feed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'orderby' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.46 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query in the prepare_items() method of the Houzez_Property_Feed_Admin_Logs_Export_Table (and Houzez_Property_Feed_Admin_Logs_Import_Table) class. The user-controlled $_GET['orderby'] and $_GET['order'] values are filtered only with sanitize_text_field() and then concatenated into the SQL format string before $wpdb->prepare() is called — prepare() only parameterizes the appended LIMIT/OFFSET clause and cannot retroactively secure the already-tainted ORDER BY clause. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55790 | 2026-07-02 | N/A | ||
| Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59095 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobehub | 2026-07-02 | 7.7 High |
| LobeChat before 2.2.10-canary.18 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to direct internal HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs by supplying user-controlled input to the skill import service (importFromUrl) and topic cover update (fetchImageFromUrl) endpoints, which use the global fetch without the project's ssrf-safe-fetch wrapper. Attackers can target internal addresses such as cloud instance metadata endpoints through these unprotected code paths to disclose internal service responses and cloud credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57765 | 2 Levelfourdevelopment, Wordpress | 2 Wp-easycart, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 8.5 High |
| Contributor SQL Injection in WP EasyCart <= 5.9.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57758 | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Permalink Manager for WooCommerce <= 1.0.8.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57752 | 2026-07-02 | 8.5 High | ||
| Contributor SQL Injection in iNET Webkit 1.2.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57746 | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Subscriber Broken Access Control in Booked <= 3.0.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57687 | 2 Hiroaki Miyashita, Wordpress | 2 Custom Field Template, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 8.5 High |
| Contributor SQL Injection in Custom Field Template <= 2.7.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57681 | 2 Paolo, Wordpress | 2 Geodirectory, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| Subscriber Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.161 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57624 | 2026-07-02 | 10 Critical | ||
| Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in Blocksy Companion Pro <= 2.1.46 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58578 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobehub | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| LobeChat before version 2.2.10-canary.15 contains a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to block the Node.js event loop by supplying a catastrophic-backtracking pattern in a GitHub repository URL path during skill import. Attackers can craft a malicious basePath value containing unescaped regex metacharacters such as catastrophic-backtracking patterns, which are injected into a dynamically constructed regular expression in the findSkillMd function and executed synchronously against archive entries, denying service to all concurrent users for tens of seconds per request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2340 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 10 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 7 more | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4408 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 11 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 8 more | 2026-07-02 | 9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Samba. A remote attacker can exploit a misconfiguration in Samba file servers and classic domain controllers that use the "check password script" feature. If this script is configured with the %u substitution character, the client-controlled username is passed without proper escaping of shell meta-characters. This vulnerability allows an attacker to achieve remote command execution on the affected system. This issue primarily affects non-standard configurations where the "check password script" is used with %u and the samba-dcerpcd service is started as a system service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3012 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 10 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 7 more | 2026-07-02 | 8 High |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy handling. When certificate auto-enrollment is enabled, Samba may retrieve a CA certificate over an unencrypted HTTP connection and install it into the local trust store without proper verification. An attacker with the ability to intercept or redirect network traffic could exploit this behavior to supply a malicious certificate authority certificate, potentially allowing interception or spoofing of trusted communications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1933 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 10 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 7 more | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s handling of NTFS-style reparse points on shares configured with read only = yes. Due to missing SMB-layer access checks, authenticated users with underlying filesystem write permissions may create or delete reparse point metadata through SMB operations even on read-only exports. This could allow modification of SMB-visible file behavior, including converting files into symbolic links or other reparse point types. | ||||