Export limit exceeded: 420915 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420915 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-46487 | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High | ||
| GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 4.0.0-alpha.1 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, the Elasticsearch-backed search proxy can skip GeoNetwork's access-control filter injection when a client request has an omitted query field. The request is then forwarded to Elasticsearch without group visibility, draft exclusion, record ownership, or portal-specific filtering. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the affected public search API to retrieve the full indexed contents of metadata records that should not be publicly visible. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112437 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-03 | 7.8 High |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to gain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107027 | 2026-11-03 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Insecure permissions in lz233 Tarnhelm v1.8.2 (versionCode 20250630) allows unauthorized attackers to invoke an exported component, leading to arbitrary data access and overwriting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107043 | 2026-11-03 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Insecure permissions in Code Catcher versionCode 131 allow unauthorized attackers to arbitrarily manipulate the app's SMS-code-capture mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107048 | 1 Motionui | 1 Motionui-android | 2026-11-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in the WebView rendering path component of MotionCreative Motion UI versionCode 101 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via supplying a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107059 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in Nextcloud versionCode 30390190 allows attackers to force victim users to logout of their accounts and switch to an attacker controlled progile, bypassing authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109594 | 2026-11-03 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Post-authentication Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the End-of-Life SonicWall GMS 9.5.2 and earlier versions which in specific conditions could potentially allow an authenticated attacker to access or modify information stored in the GMS database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12944 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 can allow attackers to execute arbitrary Python code with root privileges (UID=0) on the Langflow server by submitting components containing socket or urllib imports. This enables: (1) AWS credential theft via IMDSv1 SSRF with full IAM role permissions, (2) arbitrary file exfiltration from the container filesystem, and (3) lateral movement to internal services (PostgreSQL, Redis) within the Docker network. The scanner incorrectly returns "validated": true, providing a false security signal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12767 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12766 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12765 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12763 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 4.2 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to access another user's MCP server context due to improper cache key isolation in the MCP Tools component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17628 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to change the password of an account due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97072 | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in myCred myCred mycred allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects myCred: from n/a through 4.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65631 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in erlang-jose allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a CPU-exhaustion denial of service by submitting a crafted RSA JSON Web Key. When an application parses an untrusted JWK through the public jose_jwk:from_binary/1 or jose_jwk:from_map/1 API (or the Elixir wrappers JOSE.JWK.from_binary/1 and JOSE.JWK.from_map/1), an RSA private key that supplies d, e, and n but omits all Chinese Remainder Theorem parameters (p, q, dp, dq, qi) is routed into convert_sfm_to_crt/1, which tries to recover the missing primes by factoring the modulus. The three integers are read straight from the base64url input and are never validated as a real RSA key. When the modulus cannot be split into two factors (for example, when it is itself prime), the search loop convert_sfm_to_crt_find_p/6 performs a modular exponentiation over the attacker-sized modulus on every iteration and never succeeds. A single request of a few hundred bytes forces close to one CPU-second of work before an internal one-second watchdog kills the worker, and a larger modulus raises the cost further. By flooding such requests an attacker can saturate every scheduler and deny service, without credentials, a valid RSA key, or any special configuration. This issue affects jose: from 1.7.7 before 1.11.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28336 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 9.9 Critical |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a command injection vulnerability that could lead to the compromise of the remotely controlled host. Authentication is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28335 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 8.4 High |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability that can result in remote code execution. Authentication is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28327 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 8.2 High |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a DLL hijacking vulnerability. The hijack occurs during installations only and requires access to the local machine and admin privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121578 | 1 Amidaware | 1 Tactical Rmm | 2026-11-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| Tactical RMM contains a stored XSS vulnerability caused by improperly validated input or encode output for various fields, enabling HTML/JavaScript to be stored in the tools database, which is then executed in the browsers of users when they view content containing the infected objects, leading to account takeover or code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121564 | 1 Lucasrodes | 1 Whatstk | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors (CWE-1023) in merge_chats() (whatstk/utils/chat_merge.py), reached from BaseChat.merge(), in whatstk from 0.3.0 before 0.9.0 allows a party that supplies the chat exports to cause messages to be absent from the merged output with no indication that anything was removed, because the merge keeps whole the chat whose first message is oldest and appends from the other only the messages that are strictly newer than the last message of the first. Every message of the second chat that falls inside the date range already covered by the first is therefore discarded. The two chats are compared on their date ranges and not on the identity of the individual messages, so a message held by only one of the two exports is dropped whenever its date falls inside the range of the other, and both branches of _merge_two_chats() behave this way. The merged result is returned without a warning and without a count of what was removed. This results in a merged chat that omits messages the inputs contain, in a library whose documented uses include forensic review and the generation of training data. | ||||