Export limit exceeded: 381370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 381370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (381370 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17423 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.7 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17422 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72848 | 2026-08-20 | 8.6 High | ||
| SitemapLoader.parse_sitemap in langchain_community/document_loaders/sitemap.py applies the documented restrict_to_same_domain control only to leaf url entries. The loop over url elements filters cross-domain locations, but the loop over nested sitemap elements passes the child loc straight to self.scrape_all([loc.text], "xml"), which reaches WebBaseLoader.scrape_all and an aiohttp GET, with no domain comparison and no check for private, loopback or link-local destinations. An attacker who controls or influences an ingested sitemap can therefore point a nested sitemap entry at an internal address and make the server fetch it even when the deploying application set restrict_to_same_domain to True specifically to confine outbound requests. The fetched content is parsed and surfaces in the returned Documents, so internal responses are disclosed to the caller rather than merely requested. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72846 | 2026-08-20 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| Lightdash stores the webhook URL supplied with a scheduled delivery and later posts to it from sendWebhook in packages/backend/src/clients/GoogleChat/GoogleChatClient.ts and in packages/backend/src/clients/MicrosoftTeams/MicrosoftTeamsClient.ts. In affected versions both call fetch on the stored URL directly. The validatePublicHttpUrl helper in packages/backend/src/utils/ssrfProtection.ts, used for MCP server URLs, is not applied on either path, and the webhook fields carry no server-side URL constraint. A user able to create or trigger a scheduled delivery can therefore direct the server to issue POST requests to private, loopback and link-local addresses, including cloud metadata endpoints, and can distinguish reachable internal services from unreachable ones through the resulting errors. The upstream response is never returned to the requester; on a failure status its body is written to the server log instead. Version 1.146.4 routes both clients through postSchedulerWebhook from packages/backend/src/utils/schedulerWebhookValidation rather than calling fetch directly. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72843 | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The customer update route in EverShop is declared with "access": "public" in packages/evershop/src/modules/customer/api/updateCustomer/route.json, which causes the admin authentication middleware to call next() without checking the caller, and no customer-session middleware guards the route; the only middleware in the chain parses the JSON body. The handler in updateCustomer.js then loads the customer by the uuid taken from the URL path and writes the supplied fields back to that record, hashing a password if one is provided, without verifying that the caller owns the record. An unauthenticated request carrying a known customer uuid can therefore overwrite that customer's email address and password and read back the updated record from the 200 response, taking over the account and locking out its owner. Customer uuids are exposed through order confirmation email links and administrative URLs. Version 2.2.1 changes the route to "access": "private". | ||||
| CVE-2026-72818 | 1 Nltk | 1 Nltk | 2026-08-20 | 7.5 High |
| The URLS regular expression in nltk/tokenize/casual.py, compiled into TweetTokenizer.WORD_RE and applied by TweetTokenizer.tokenize, contains a naked-domain branch whose domain-label prefix [a-z0-9]+(?:[.\-][a-z0-9]+)* is unbounded. Input consisting of many alternating label separators can be partitioned in exponentially many ways, and because the branch also requires a trailing top-level domain that such input never supplies, the engine explores those partitions before failing at each offset. A few kilobytes of input therefore consumes seconds to minutes of single-threaded CPU, and the HANG_RE substitution performed before matching does not collapse the pattern. TweetTokenizer is intended for tokenizing untrusted social-media text, so any service that applies it, or the module-level casual_tokenize, to submitted text can be stalled per request without authentication. Version 3.10.1 bounds the label repetition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17195 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17171 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to overwrite arbitrary files due to improper resolution of symbolic links. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17170 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of an allocation size. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17168 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 8.5 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17165 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a NULL pointer dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17163 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of an array size field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17160 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an integer overflow during size computation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17159 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an integer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17157 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17152 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77644 | 2026-08-20 | N/A | ||
| A critical bypass access control vulnerability has been reported in PTC Windchill Risk and Reliability (WRR) Enterprise Edition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17145 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper privilege management. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17142 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17141 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Powervm Vios | 2026-08-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||