Export limit exceeded: 10373 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10373 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-9092 | 1 Symantec | 2 Content Analysis, Mail Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16565 | 1 Grandstream | 2 Ht802, Ht802 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in /cgi-bin/login on Vonage (Grandstream) HT802 devices allows attackers to authenticate a user via the login screen using the default password of 123 and submit arbitrary requests. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16244 | 1 Octobercms | 1 October | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in OctoberCMS 1.0.426 (aka Build 426) due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for postback handling, allowing an attacker to successfully take over the victim's account. The attack bypasses a protection mechanism involving X-CSRF headers and CSRF tokens via a certain _handler postback variable. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11648 | 1 Techroutes | 2 Tr 1803-3g, Tr 1803-3g Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Techroutes TR 1803-3G Wireless Cellular Router/Modem 2.4.25 devices do not possess any protection against a CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by a goform/BasicSettings request to disable port filtering. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15808 | 1 Phpmyfaq | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In phpMyFaq before 2.9.9, there is CSRF in admin/ajax.config.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9033 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Serverprotect | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8624 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12, 1.24.x before 1.24.5, 1.25.x before 1.25.4, and 1.26.x before 1.26.1 does not perform token comparison in constant time before determining if a debugging message should be logged, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8623. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1218 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123858. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11196 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Pulse Connect Secure 8.3R1 has CSRF in logout.cgi. The logout function of the admin panel is not protected by any CSRF tokens, thus allowing an attacker to logout a user by making them visit a malicious web page. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9694 | 1 Huawei | 64 Tecal Bh620 V2, Tecal Bh620 V2 Firmware, Tecal Bh621 V2 and 61 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Huawei Tecal RH1288 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285 V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285H V2 V100R002C00SPC111 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2268 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2288 V2 V100R002C00SPC117 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2288H V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2485 V2 V100R002C00SPC502 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V2 V100R001C02SPC109 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V3 V100R003C01SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885H V3 V100R003C00SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal XH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH311 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal DH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH620 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal DH628 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH620 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH621 V2 V100R002C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal BH622 V2 V100R002C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal BH640 V2 V100R002C00SPC108 and earlier versions, Tecal CH121 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH140 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal CH220 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH221 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH222 V100R002C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH240 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V3 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions have a CSRF vulnerability. The products do not use the Token mechanism for web access control. When users log in to the Huawei servers and access websites containing the malicious CSRF script, the CSRF script is executed, which may cause configuration tampering and system restart. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6897 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_update_plugin function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of subscribers for /dev/random read operations by leveraging a late call to the check_ajax_referer function, a related issue to CVE-2016-6896. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6086 | 1 Vimbadmin | 1 Vimbadmin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the addAction and purgeAction functions in ViMbAdmin 3.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of logged administrators to (1) add an administrator user via a crafted POST request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/DomainController.php, (2) remove an administrator user via a crafted GET request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/DomainController.php, (3) change an administrator password via a crafted POST request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/DomainController.php, (4) add a mailbox via a crafted POST request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/MailboxController.php, (5) delete a mailbox via a crafted POST request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/MailboxController.php, (6) archive a mailbox address via a crafted GET request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/ArchiveController.php, (7) add an alias address via a crafted POST request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/AliasController.php, or (8) remove an alias address via a crafted GET request to <vimbadmin directory>/application/controllers/AliasController.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2238 | 1 Toshiba | 4 Hem-gw16a, Hem-gw16a Firmware, Hem-gw26a and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Toshiba Home gateway HEM-GW16A firmware HEM-GW16A-FW-V1.2.0 and earlier and Toshiba Home gateway HEM-GW26A firmware HEM-GW26A-FW-V1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5657 | 1 Apache | 1 Archiva | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Several REST service endpoints of Apache Archiva are not protected against Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. A malicious site opened in the same browser as the archiva site, may send an HTML response that performs arbitrary actions on archiva services, with the same rights as the active archiva session (e.g. administrator rights). | ||||
| CVE-2017-1194 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123669. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7447 | 1 Helpdezk | 1 Helpdezk | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| HelpDEZk 1.1.1 has CSRF in admin/home#/logos/ with an impact of remote execution of arbitrary PHP code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8718 | 1 Moxa | 2 Awk-3131a, Awk-3131a Firmware | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| An exploitable Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in the Web Application functionality of Moxa AWK-3131A Wireless Access Point running firmware 1.1. A specially crafted form can trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server which will be treated as an authentic request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2682 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Network Management Software | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Siemens web application RUGGEDCOM NMS < V1.2 on port 8080/TCP and 8081/TCP could allow a remote attacker to perform a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attack, potentially allowing an attacker to execute administrative operations, provided the targeted user has an active session and is induced to trigger a malicious request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9606 | 1 Infotecs | 2 Vipnet Client, Vipnet Coordinator | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Infotecs ViPNet Client and Coordinator before 4.3.2-42442 allow local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse ViPNet update file in the update folder. The attack succeeds because of incorrect folder permissions in conjunction with a lack of integrity and authenticity checks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5368 | 1 Zoneminder | 1 Zoneminder | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ZoneMinder v1.30 and v1.29, an open-source CCTV server web application, is vulnerable to CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) which allows a remote attack to make changes to the web application as the current logged in victim. If the victim visits a malicious web page, the attacker can silently and automatically create a new admin user within the web application for remote persistence and further attacks. The URL is /zm/index.php and sample parameters could include action=user uid=0 newUser[Username]=attacker1 newUser[Password]=Password1234 conf_password=Password1234 newUser[System]=Edit (among others). | ||||