Export limit exceeded: 14153 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 378327 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 378327 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 14153 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (14153 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-67975 | 1 Nasa | 1 Cfs | 2026-08-12 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to arbitrarily remove low-index subscriptions and add new streams via sending TO_LAB add/remove subscription commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18636 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Velociraptor | 2026-08-11 | 6.8 Medium |
| The Velociraptor gRPC API has a VFSGetBuffer endpoint which allows reading files from the datastore. To prevent users from reading sensitive files or accessing other orgs, the requested path is prefix checked against a list of denied prefixes. This prefix check can be bypassed allowing a user to access usually denied files. If the user has read permission in the ROOT org, this allows access to other orgs, in which the user may not have permission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54635 | 1 Nessshon | 1 Tonapi | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| pytonapi is a Python SDK for TONAPI that provides REST API, streaming, and webhook access to the TON blockchain. From 2.0.0 to 2.2.0, TonapiWebhookDispatcher fails to validate the Authorization header when a webhook handler is registered with the documented path argument, because setup() stores bearer tokens only under the default suffix paths and never adds the custom path to the token map, so self._tokens.get(path) returns None and the authentication guard is skipped. An unauthenticated remote attacker can POST forged payloads to the custom webhook endpoint and trigger victim-defined handlers. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39832 | 1 Golang | 2 Crypto, Ssh | 2026-08-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| When adding a key to a remote agent constraint extensions such as [email protected] were not serialized in the request. Destination restrictions were silently stripped when forwarding keys, allowing unrestricted use of the key on the remote host. The client now serializes all constraint extensions. Additionally, the in-memory keyring returned by NewKeyring() now rejects keys with unsupported constraint extensions instead of silently ignoring them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16299 | 2026-08-11 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Single Sign On For TNG WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not properly validate a password reset request, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reset the password of arbitrary users, including administrators, which could lead to a full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18947 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 2 Red Hat Openshift Ai (rhoai), Openshift Ai | 2026-08-11 | 8.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Feast. An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the /materialize and /materialize-incremental endpoints. By sending a specially crafted request that omits the feature_views field, an attacker can bypass intended permission checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker, or any authenticated user, to trigger a full re-materialization of all feature views. The consequence is a Denial of Service (DoS) due to data corruption and significant resource consumption across all tenants. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18860 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Velociraptor | 2026-08-11 | 8.7 High |
| Velociraptor allows multi-tenant deployments named "Orgs". By default Velociraptor, uses the ROOT org, but users can create child orgs for other tenants within the same deployment. Users can have different permissions in each org. To manage Orgs, Velociraptor usually examines the ORG_ADMIN permission on the ROOT org. This issue results from the Velociraptor server allowing for the deletion of Orgs by incorrectly checking the ORG_ADMIN permission of callers within the calling ORG instead of the ROOT org. However, Org admins of child orgs were able to add this permission to their ACL token within their own org. This allows an administrator in a child org, which is not also an administrator in the ROOT org, to delete other orgs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16953 | 2 Ai Engine Project, Wordpress | 2 Ai Engine, Wordpress | 2026-08-11 | 4.8 Medium |
| The AI Engine WordPress plugin before 3.6.4 does not verify ownership of a guest's uploaded chatbot files before deletion, authorising the action solely by a client-supplied session cookie value, so an unauthenticated attacker who obtains a victim's session identifier and file reference can delete that victim's uploaded files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16282 | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Appointment Hour Booking WordPress plugin before 1.5.88 does not validate a client-supplied booking price against the server-side configured service price, allowing unauthenticated users to submit an arbitrary final price (including zero or negative) that is stored as the authoritative booking price, corrupting booking and payment records. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16269 | 2026-08-11 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| The Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.16 does not strictly compare its API authentication key, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass the API authentication via type juggling and perform privileged actions such as modifying subscriber records and sending emails, when the optional API has been enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34753 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Threat Defense Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the payload inspection for Ethernet Industrial Protocol (ENIP) traffic for Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured rules for ENIP traffic. This vulnerability is due to incomplete processing during deep packet inspection for ENIP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted ENIP packet to the targeted interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured access control and intrusion policies that should trigger and drop for the ENIP packet. | ||||
| CVE-2019-12627 | 1 Cisco | 29 Amp 7150, Amp 8150, Firepower 7010 and 26 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the application policy configuration of the Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized read access to sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to insufficient application identification. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted traffic to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized read access to sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3565 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the TCP Intercept functionality of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured Access Control Policies (including Geolocation) and Service Polices on an affected system. The vulnerability exists because TCP Intercept is invoked when the embryonic connection limit is reached, which can cause the underlying detection engine to process the packet incorrectly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted stream of traffic that matches a policy on which TCP Intercept is configured. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to match on an incorrect policy, which could allow the traffic to be forwarded when it should be dropped. In addition, the traffic could incorrectly be dropped. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3564 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance, Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the FTP inspection engine of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass FTP inspection. The vulnerability is due to ineffective flow tracking of FTP traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted FTP traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass FTP inspection and successfully complete FTP connections. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3253 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the support tunnel feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to access the shell of an affected device even though expert mode is disabled. The vulnerability is due to improper configuration of the support tunnel feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by enabling the support tunnel, setting a key, and deriving the tunnel password. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to run any system command with root access on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1980 | 1 Cisco | 3 Firepower Services Software For Asa, Secure Firewall Management Center, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the protocol detection component of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software, Cisco FirePOWER Services Software for ASA, and Cisco Firepower Management Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass filtering protections. The vulnerability is due to improper detection of the initial use of a protocol on a nonstandard port. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic on a nonstandard port for the protocol in use through an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass filtering and deliver malicious requests to protected systems that would otherwise be blocked. Once the initial protocol flow on the nonstandard port is detected, future flows on the nonstandard port will be successfully detected and handled as configured by the applied policy. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3186 | 1 Cisco | 25 Asa 5505, Asa 5505 Firmware, Asa 5510 and 22 more | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the management access list configuration of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured management interface access list on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to the configuration of different management access lists, with ports allowed in one access list and denied in another. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted remote management traffic to the local IP address of an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured management access list policies, and traffic to the management interface would not be properly denied. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20247 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the remote access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured multiple certificate authentication policy and connect using only a valid username and password. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling during remote access VPN authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests during remote access VPN session establishment. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured multiple certificate authentication policy while retaining the privileges and permissions associated with the original connection profile. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20269 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the remote access VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a brute force attack in an attempt to identify valid username and password combinations or an authenticated, remote attacker to establish a clientless SSL VPN session with an unauthorized user. This vulnerability is due to improper separation of authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) between the remote access VPN feature and the HTTPS management and site-to-site VPN features. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by specifying a default connection profile/tunnel group while conducting a brute force attack or while establishing a clientless SSL VPN session using valid credentials. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to achieve one or both of the following: Identify valid credentials that could then be used to establish an unauthorized remote access VPN session. Establish a clientless SSL VPN session (only when running Cisco ASA Software Release 9.16 or earlier). Notes: Establishing a client-based remote access VPN tunnel is not possible as these default connection profiles/tunnel groups do not and cannot have an IP address pool configured. This vulnerability does not allow an attacker to bypass authentication. To successfully establish a remote access VPN session, valid credentials are required, including a valid second factor if multi-factor authentication (MFA) is configured. Cisco will release software updates that address this vulnerability. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15398 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the per-user-override feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass an access control list (ACL) that is configured for an interface of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to errors that could occur when the affected software constructs and applies per-user-override rules. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to a network through an affected device that has a vulnerable configuration. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access resources that are behind the affected device and would typically be protected by the interface ACL. | ||||