Export limit exceeded: 107322 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (107322 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-83575 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-28 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83574 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-28 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83570 | 1 Microsoft | 27 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 24 more | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87397 | 1 Oracle | 1 Outside In Technology | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Outside In Technology product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Outside In Core). The supported version that is affected is 8.5.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Outside In Technology. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Outside In Technology. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-88967 | 1 Grafana | 2 Grafana, Grafana Enterprise | 2026-10-28 | 7.7 High |
| A user with query access to an Azure Monitor data source in Grafana can cause server-side requests to an attacker-controlled endpoint that disclose the data source's Azure access token (server-side request forgery). | ||||
| CVE-2026-82961 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| The GPIO syscall handlers in drivers/gpio/gpio_handlers.c did not validate the pin argument supplied by a user-mode caller. z_vrfy_gpio_pin_configure(), z_vrfy_gpio_pin_get_config() and z_vrfy_gpio_pin_interrupt_configure() verified only the device object (K_SYSCALL_DRIVER_GPIO() / K_SYSCALL_OBJ()) and then passed the caller-supplied gpio_pin_t straight through to z_impl_gpio_pin_*() and on to the driver. The only pin check in include/zephyr/drivers/gpio.h was __ASSERT(gpio_port_pin_is_supported(cfg->port_pin_mask, pin), ...), which compiles to nothing unless CONFIG_ASSERT is enabled, so in a production build no check existed at all. GPIO drivers use pin as a shift count and as an array index on the documented assumption that it is a pin the controller supports. On STM32, for example, gpio_stm32_pin_interrupt_configure() turns pin into an EXTI line and stm32_gpio_intc_set_irq_callback() writes data->cb[line_num].cb and data->cb[line_num].data into a NUM_EXTI_LINES-entry array (default 16) in drivers/interrupt_controller/intc_gpio_stm32.c, guarded only by a compiled-out __ASSERT_NO_MSG(); the same function then reads exti_irq_table[line_num] and calls irq_enable() on the result. Other controllers index fixed-size per-pin configuration tables the same way — drivers/gpio/gpio_ite_it8xxx2_v2.c reads an MMIO base pointer out of wuc_base[8] with the caller's pin and performs a read-modify-write through it. The issue is reachable only in builds with CONFIG_USERSPACE=y (the file is compiled under that symbol), by a user-mode thread that has been granted access to a GPIO device object. Such a grant is intended to authorize control of that port's pins; the missing validation instead lets the thread drive a supervisor-mode out-of-bounds write of a function pointer and an associated void * past a kernel .bss array, and out-of-bounds reads that feed irq_enable() and MMIO accesses — an escape from the user-mode sandbox that can lead to kernel memory corruption, arbitrary code execution, or a crash. The fix validates pin against the controller's gpio_driver_config.port_pin_mask with gpio_port_pin_is_supported() in every pin-taking z_vrfy_ handler and returns -EINVAL otherwise, complemented by an unconditional pin >= GPIO_MAX_PINS_PER_PORT range check added to the shared z_impl_gpio_pin_*() inlines. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83568 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 7 more | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Improper access control in Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83567 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83566 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 7 more | 2026-10-28 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Win32K - ICOMP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78674 | 1 Wso2 | 2 Business Process Server, Enterprise Integrator Bps Profile | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| The BPMN System REST APIs do not sufficiently validate input parameters, allowing authenticated users to submit crafted requests that can lead to the execution of arbitrary commands on the server. An authenticated user can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the product's runtime account. The scope of potential damage is contingent upon the permissions assigned to this account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91347 | 1 Oracle | 1 Isupport | 2026-10-28 | 8.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the iSupport product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Service Requests). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise iSupport. While the vulnerability is in iSupport, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all iSupport accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of iSupport. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.5 (Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L). | ||||
| CVE-2026-109411 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Samba | 2026-10-28 | 8.1 High |
| An access control bypass flaw was found in Samba's vfs_ceph_rgw module in it's openat() function. An authenticated user can bypass access controls to read or overwrite restricted files on shares configured with the experimental vfs_ceph_rgw module. When a client requests an existing file using mismatched character casing, the module fails to perform a case-insensitive lookup correctly, causing the server to treat the operation as creating a new file. As a result, the server skips standard permission checks on the existing file, allowing the attacker to access or overwrite sensitive data owned by other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88152 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-28 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17615 | 1 Redhat | 21 Apache Camel Quarkus, Apicurio Registry, Build Keycloak and 18 more | 2026-10-28 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in RESTEasy's SourceProvider. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform an unauthenticated remote file read. By sending a specially crafted XML body with a DOCTYPE declaration referencing external entities to an endpoint that accepts application/xml and returns Source or StreamSource, the server can be tricked into resolving the entity and including sensitive file contents in the HTTP response. This is due to the SourceProvider.writeTo() method creating a SAXParser without disabling external entity resolution, leading to an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118336 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Improper input validation in Headless in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-118338 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Animation in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-118339 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Animation in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-118349 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Memory corruption in Payments in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-118341 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Modularization in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-118346 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-28 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.73 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||