Export limit exceeded: 376980 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (376980 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-56443 2026-08-13 N/A
Token public-only scope bypassed on Limited-visibility owners (Repository + Package categories) — residual after CVE-2026-25714 / PR #37118
CVE-2026-55987 2026-08-13 N/A
OAuth2 sign-in reactivates an administrator-deactivated account on auth sources without refresh tokens (incomplete fix of #38009)
CVE-2026-55986 2026-08-13 N/A
Email Management API Bypasses ManageCredentials Feature Restrictions
CVE-2026-55984 2026-08-13 N/A
Null Pointer Dereference in AddTime API Causes Authenticated Denial of Service
CVE-2026-55982 2026-08-13 N/A
OIDC userinfo Endpoint Returns Identity Claims Without Enforcing API Token Scopes
CVE-2026-54481 2026-08-13 N/A
Internal API HTTP client hardcodes InsecureSkipVerify:true with no config override (CWE-295)
CVE-2026-50105 2026-08-13 N/A
RSS/Atom feed handlers bypass API-token scope & public-only confinement (incomplete fix of #37698)
CVE-2026-42931 2026-08-13 N/A
Denial of Service via Unbounded io.ReadAll in NPM Package Tag Endpoint
CVE-2026-23603 2026-08-13 N/A
Blind SSRF in OAuth2 avatar synchronization via unvalidated OIDC picture claim
CVE-2026-59109 2026-08-13 8.8 High
SQL injection in the Zalktis accounting application via trading-partner-controlled text fields in received electronic invoices. When importing a received e-invoice (UBL/PEPPOL) or an e-commerce export, Zalktis concatenates partner-controlled values directly into SQL statement text using string concatenation, with neither parameterised queries nor escaping. The application's own escaping helper, Dazadi.sql_txt(), is not invoked on these code paths, so a party that sends an invoice can break out of the string literal and alter the query logic. This issue affects Zalktis: before 2026.1.586 and before 2026.2.592.
CVE-2026-73266 1 Redhat 1 Multicluster Engine 2026-08-13 7.1 High
A flaw was found in the clusterclaims-controller component of Multicluster Engine (MCE). An authenticated tenant can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating ClusterClaim labels. This allows the tenant to force a cluster to join a ManagedClusterSet belonging to another tenant. Such unauthorized access could enable the injection of policies and workloads into other tenants' clusters.
CVE-2026-17110 1 Ibm 1 I 2026-08-13 8.8 High
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands and obtain sensitive information due to improper privilege management.
CVE-2026-17218 1 Ibm 1 I 2026-08-13 9.8 Critical
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.
CVE-2026-17222 1 Ibm 1 I 2026-08-13 4.3 Medium
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify data in certain SQL tables due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
CVE-2026-17248 1 Ibm 1 I 2026-08-13 7.1 High
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements in an OS command.
CVE-2026-68452 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-13 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/zcrypt: Validate length for CCA AES cipher key requests cca_cipher2protkey() derives the copy length for the CPRB parameter block directly from the length field in the key token. Reject the request early if the token length exceeds the available space in the parameter block.
CVE-2026-68453 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-13 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/zcrypt: Fix buffer over-read in cca_cipher2protkey Add validation of both the actual key buffer size and token length fields in all the cca_check_sec*token() functions. Additionally check in cca_gencipherkey() for possible underflow with returned key size. The CCA token structures contain user-controlled len fields that were used in operations without proper validation against both the actual buffer size and minimum token structure size. An attacker could set this field larger than the actual buffer size, leading to reading beyond buffer boundaries. This may result in a kernel crash or exposure of memory via sending this as part of a request down to the crypto card. Also an attacker could have used a very small len value and thus enforce a buffer under-run which may produce similar effects as a over-read. So now a key must - key buf length must be at least sizeof the token struct - the key len field inside the token must fit into the range of sizeof key token struct ... key buf length
CVE-2026-73570 1 Zimbra 1 Collaboration 2026-08-13 8.9 High
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user.
CVE-2026-73571 1 Zimbra 1 Collaboration 2026-08-13 3.1 Low
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17 due to improper authorization validation in delegated email sending functionality. An authenticated attacker can send specially crafted SOAP requests to impersonate another user and send emails without possessing the required delegation or send-as permissions. This occurs in the SaveDraftRequest SOAP handler.
CVE-2026-73572 1 Zimbra 1 Collaboration 2026-08-13 6.1 Medium
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Classic Web Client due to insufficient sanitization of specific attachment content during inline preview. An attacker can send a crafted email containing a malicious attachment that, when previewed by a user, executes arbitrary JavaScript within the victim's browser session. Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim user, potentially leading to data exfiltration or unauthorized access to sensitive information.