| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 through 2.0.0; (5) NetApp (aka Network Appliance) Data ONTAP 7.3RC1 and 7.3RC2; (6) SNMP Research before 16.2; (7) multiple Cisco IOS, CatOS, ACE, and Nexus products; (8) Ingate Firewall 3.1.0 and later and SIParator 3.1.0 and later; (9) HP OpenView SNMP Emanate Master Agent 15.x; and possibly other products relies on the client to specify the HMAC length, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass SNMP authentication via a length value of 1, which only checks the first byte. |
| The SSLVPN feature in Cisco IOS 12.3 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via a crafted HTTPS packet. |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 on Gigabit Switch Router (GSR) devices (aka 12000 Series routers) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a malformed Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) packet. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4, when certificate-based authentication is enabled for IKE, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Phase 1 SA exhaustion) via crafted requests, aka Bug IDs CSCsy07555 and CSCee72997. |
| The (1) Airline Product Set (aka ALPS), (2) Serial Tunnel Code (aka STUN), (3) Block Serial Tunnel Code (aka BSTUN), (4) Native Client Interface Architecture (NCIA) support, (5) Data-link switching (aka DLSw), (6) Remote Source-Route Bridging (RSRB), (7) Point to Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP), (8) X.25 for Record Boundary Preservation (RBP), (9) X.25 over TCP (XOT), and (10) X.25 Routing features in Cisco IOS 12.2 and 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a series of crafted TCP packets. |
| The SERVICE.DNS signature engine in the Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) in Cisco IOS 12.3 and 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash or hang) via network traffic that triggers unspecified IPS signatures, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-1447. |
| Memory leak in the TCP listener in Cisco IOS 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, and 12.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending crafted TCP traffic to an IPv4 address on the IOS device. |
| Cisco IOS 12.2E, 12.2F, and 12.2S places a "no login" line into the VTY configuration when an administrator makes certain changes to a (1) VTY/AUX or (2) CONSOLE setting on a device without AAA enabled, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain a terminal session, a different vulnerability than CVE-1999-0293 and CVE-2005-2105. |
| Cisco IOS 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, and 12.x and IOS XR 2.0.x, 3.0.x, and 3.2.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via a crafted IP option in the IP header in a (1) ICMP, (2) PIMv2, (3) PGM, or (4) URD packet. |
| Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted IPv6 Type 0 Routing header. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the HTTP server in Cisco IOS 11.0 through 12.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the query string to the ping program or (2) unspecified other aspects of the URI. |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Command EXEC in Cisco IOS allow local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors, aka (1) PSIRT-0474975756 and (2) PSIRT-0388256465. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. |
| Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 on Cisco 10000, uBR10012 and uBR7200 series devices handles external UDP packets that are sent to 127.0.0.0/8 addresses intended for IPC communication within the device, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device or linecard reload) via crafted UDP packets, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3805. |
| The (1) Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express; (2) SIP Gateway Signaling Support Over Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport; (3) Secure Signaling and Media Encryption; (4) Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP); (5) Network Admission Control HTTP Authentication Proxy; (6) Per-user URL Redirect for EAPoUDP, Dot1x, and MAC Authentication Bypass; (7) Distributed Director with HTTP Redirects; and (8) TCP DNS features in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 do not properly handle IP sockets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (outage or resource consumption) via a series of crafted TCP packets. |
| Cisco IOS 12.4 and earlier, when using the crypto packages and SSL support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a malformed (1) ClientHello, (2) ChangeCipherSpec, or (3) Finished message during an SSL session. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted H.323 packet, aka Bug ID CSCsz38104. |
| Cisco IOS 12.2 and 12.4, when NAT Skinny Call Control Protocol (SCCP) Fragmentation Support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via segmented SCCP messages, aka Cisco Bug ID CSCsi17020, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3810. |
| Off-by-one error in Cisco IOS allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: as of 20071016, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, since it is from a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes. |
| Cisco IOS 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, and 12.4, with IPv4 UDP services and the IPv6 protocol enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash and possible blocked interface) via a crafted IPv6 packet to the device. |
| The Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) and IOS with Firewall/IPS Feature Set do not properly handle certain full-width and half-width Unicode character encodings, which might allow remote attackers to evade detection of HTTP traffic. |
