| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| GoCD is a continuous deliver server. From 20.2.0 until 26.1.0, the internal pipeline structure API used for autocompletion while editing pipeline, template, environment, and user-preference configuration returns its users-and-roles mode to regular authenticated users without requiring an administrator role. A lower-privileged user can enumerate configured user names and available role names, which can facilitate attacks against those users. The response does not reveal which roles are assigned to each user, and the endpoint cannot modify data. This issue is fixed in version 26.1.0. |
| Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| In buildIntentSenderForUser of LauncherAppsService.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In multiple functions of LocalImageResolver.java, there is a possible Remote Persistent Denial of Service due to a DNG image rendering check bypass. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| OpenCVE versions 2.4.0 before 3.1.0 fails to properly scope the organizations API endpoint to the token's organization, instead returning the token creator's memberships. Attackers with organization-scoped tokens can list and retrieve every organization their creator belongs to, bypassing intended token isolation boundaries. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, watchOS 27. A sandboxed app may be able to access the System Keychain. |
| Databasement before 1.7.14 validates invitation tokens only when the acceptance page loads, caching the authorization decision without re-checking token validity during acceptance. Attackers with a leaked or forwarded invitation link can load the page while pending, then accept the invitation after the legitimate user has already accepted it to overwrite the account password and gain authenticated access to managed database credentials and secrets. |
| Gardener implements the automated management and operation of Kubernetes clusters as a service. Prior to 1.142.6, 1.143.3, 1.144.2, and 1.145.0, the customverbauthorizer admission plugin's mustCheckProjectMembers manage-members check compares changes to User subjects but does not account for Group or ServiceAccount subjects in Project.spec.members. A project administrator who lacks manage-members permission can add arbitrary Group or ServiceAccount subjects, including the system:authenticated Group, and thereby grant broad project access. The resulting access can include Shoots, Secrets, and cloud provider credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 1.142.6, 1.143.3, 1.144.2, and 1.145.0. |
| Unleash is an open-source feature management platform. Prior to 8.0.3, POST /api/admin/projects/:projectId/features/:featureName/environments/:environment/strategies/set-sort-order passes attacker-controlled strategy IDs to unprotectedUpdateStrategiesSortOrder and updateSortOrder without verifying that the IDs belong to the project, feature, and environment authorized by the URL. In a multi-project Pro or Enterprise deployment, an authenticated user with UPDATE_FEATURE_STRATEGY in one project who knows another project's strategy IDs can reorder those strategies, changing feature evaluation precedence while the operation is attributed to the attacker's URL context rather than the affected project. The single-project OSS edition lacks the cross-project dimension, although the missing context binding still permits unauthorized reordering across features or environments in the default project. The endpoint changes only sort_order and does not modify strategy parameters, constraints, or segments. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.3. |
| Vaultwarden through 1.37.3 omits organization membership status validation from three cipher access-restriction queries, allowing revoked and not-yet-confirmed members to retain read, write, delete, and attachment access to organization ciphers. Attackers with revoked or pending membership can exploit missing status filters in get_user_collections_access_flags, get_group_collections_access_flags, and is_in_full_access_group to access protected cipher data server-side. |
| The Paid Membership Subscriptions WordPress plugin before 3.1.0 does not bind one of its unauthenticated payment actions to the requesting user, allowing someone who holds another member's in-flight payment identifier to delete that member's checkout state. |
| The Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 6.17.5 does not perform a per-object capability check on one family of its REST write routes, allowing users with a low-privilege role such as contributor to modify, unpublish, trash and take ownership of records belonging to other users, including administrators. |
| The Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 6.17.5 does not check the capability required to publish content before creating or updating it through its REST API, allowing users with a role that cannot normally publish, such as contributor, to publish content directly and bypass editorial review. |
| The Directorist: AI-Powered Business Directory, Listings & Classified Ads WordPress plugin before 8.9.5 does not properly verify a listing's ownership before deleting it, allowing authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access and above to delete arbitrary listings, including ones belonging to other users.
This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2023-1889 / CVE-2023-35052: a separate, unaddressed listing-deletion path allows the same impact, from at least version 3.1.0 through the current release. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. When attaching a source inventory to a constructed inventory through
the input_inventories relationship endpoint, the controller verifies only that
the requesting user can read the source inventory, rather than that they hold use
permission on it, unlike instance group attachment on the same access class. An
authenticated user who can administer a constructed inventory and has read-only
visibility of an inventory in another organization -- for example an
organization or system auditor -- can attach that foreign inventory as an input.
On synchronization the controller clones every host and host variable, including
secrets, into the attacker's inventory, and because the attacker administers the
constructed inventory they can run ad hoc commands against the cloned hosts,
resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of inventory data and secrets and code
execution against another tenant's managed hosts. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. When attaching an instance group to a schedule or a workflow job
template node through the dedicated API relationship endpoint, the controller
verifies only that the requesting user can read (view) the instance group,
rather than that they hold use permission on it, unlike every other instance
group assignment in the product. An authenticated user with read-only
visibility of an instance group -- for example a system auditor -- can attach a
use-restricted instance group, including the control plane group or another
tenant's container group, to a schedule or workflow node they control. Their
playbook then executes on the control plane node or within another tenant's
execution environment, leading to privilege escalation and, in the control
plane case, full compromise of the platform. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. When attaching a Galaxy or Automation Hub credential to an
organization through the galaxy_credentials relationship endpoint, the
controller verifies only that the requesting user can read the credential,
rather than that they hold use permission on it, unlike other credential
consumption in the product. An authenticated user who administers one
organization and has read-only visibility of a credential in another
organization -- for example a platform auditor -- can bind that foreign
credential to their own organization. On the next project synchronization the
controller decrypts the credential server-side and uses its token to
authenticate to the credential owner's Automation Hub, allowing cross-tenant use
of another organization's secret. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
The execute-permission check on a workflow job template node's unified job
template is skipped when the node's currently stored unified job template is
empty: the check inspects only the existing value, not the incoming one, and a
node can be created without a unified job template. An authenticated user who
holds admin permission on a single workflow job template can create an empty node
and then patch it to reference any job template, project, inventory source,
system job, or workflow on the platform -- including ones in other organizations
that they cannot otherwise read or launch. Running their own workflow then
executes the victim template with the victim's attached credentials, inventory
and project, resulting in cross-organization privilege escalation to arbitrary
automation execution. The patch response also discloses the victim template's
name and description. |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Access and security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.26.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
