Export limit exceeded: 420575 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 420575 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420575 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12765 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12763 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 4.2 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow an authenticated attacker to access another user's MCP server context due to improper cache key isolation in the MCP Tools component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17628 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to change the password of an account due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97072 | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in myCred myCred mycred allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects myCred: from n/a through 4.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65631 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity in erlang-jose allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a CPU-exhaustion denial of service by submitting a crafted RSA JSON Web Key. When an application parses an untrusted JWK through the public jose_jwk:from_binary/1 or jose_jwk:from_map/1 API (or the Elixir wrappers JOSE.JWK.from_binary/1 and JOSE.JWK.from_map/1), an RSA private key that supplies d, e, and n but omits all Chinese Remainder Theorem parameters (p, q, dp, dq, qi) is routed into convert_sfm_to_crt/1, which tries to recover the missing primes by factoring the modulus. The three integers are read straight from the base64url input and are never validated as a real RSA key. When the modulus cannot be split into two factors (for example, when it is itself prime), the search loop convert_sfm_to_crt_find_p/6 performs a modular exponentiation over the attacker-sized modulus on every iteration and never succeeds. A single request of a few hundred bytes forces close to one CPU-second of work before an internal one-second watchdog kills the worker, and a larger modulus raises the cost further. By flooding such requests an attacker can saturate every scheduler and deny service, without credentials, a valid RSA key, or any special configuration. This issue affects jose: from 1.7.7 before 1.11.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28336 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 9.9 Critical |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a command injection vulnerability that could lead to the compromise of the remotely controlled host. Authentication is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28335 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 8.4 High |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a buffer overflow vulnerability that can result in remote code execution. Authentication is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28327 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Dameware | 2026-11-03 | 8.2 High |
| SolarWinds Dameware was found to be affected by a DLL hijacking vulnerability. The hijack occurs during installations only and requires access to the local machine and admin privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121578 | 1 Amidaware | 1 Tactical Rmm | 2026-11-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| Tactical RMM contains a stored XSS vulnerability caused by improperly validated input or encode output for various fields, enabling HTML/JavaScript to be stored in the tools database, which is then executed in the browsers of users when they view content containing the infected objects, leading to account takeover or code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121564 | 1 Lucasrodes | 1 Whatstk | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors (CWE-1023) in merge_chats() (whatstk/utils/chat_merge.py), reached from BaseChat.merge(), in whatstk from 0.3.0 before 0.9.0 allows a party that supplies the chat exports to cause messages to be absent from the merged output with no indication that anything was removed, because the merge keeps whole the chat whose first message is oldest and appends from the other only the messages that are strictly newer than the last message of the first. Every message of the second chat that falls inside the date range already covered by the first is therefore discarded. The two chats are compared on their date ranges and not on the identity of the individual messages, so a message held by only one of the two exports is dropped whenever its date falls inside the range of the other, and both branches of _merge_two_chats() behave this way. The merged result is returned without a warning and without a count of what was removed. This results in a merged chat that omits messages the inputs contain, in a library whose documented uses include forensic review and the generation of training data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121413 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-11-03 | 3.1 Low |
| Parse Server before 8.6.112 and 9.0.0 before 9.10.6-alpha.4 contains an authorization bypass in the session upgrade endpoint, which creates a new session for any valid session token without enforcing the _Session class create class-level permission. Attackers holding a user's session token can send an already revocable token to /upgradeToRevocableSession to obtain additional sessions with fresh expiration that persist after the original session is logged out. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121409 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows malicious servers or unauthenticated peers to abort clients or proxies via oversized X.224 routing tokens. Attackers can send an oversized LoadBalanceInfo in a Server Redirection PDU, or a 240–247 byte token to a FixedTarget freerdp-proxy, triggering a tpdu_write_header assertion that crashes the process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121405 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| FreeRDP before 3.32.2 fails to cap the OutputBufferLength in serial device-control IRP requests, allowing malicious servers to trigger excessive memory allocation. Attackers running a server with serial redirection can send an IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL request with IOCTL_USBPRINT_GET_1284_ID and a near-maximum length to exhaust client memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119495 | 2026-11-03 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in WebberZone Better Search better-search allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Better Search: from n/a through 4.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119487 | 2026-11-03 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs Dokan dokan-lite allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Dokan: from n/a through 5.3.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119215 | 1 Team-alembic | 1 Ash Authentication | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in team-alembic ash_authentication allows a user with an account to install a TOTP secret they control on another user's account, and then sign in as that user or hold their second factor. AshAuthentication.Strategy.Totp.ConfirmSetupChange verified a setup token but did not check that it was issued to the record being confirmed, so an attacker's own pending secret could be confirmed onto another user's record. The TOTP setup changes, ConfirmSetupChange, GeneratePendingSetupChange and GenerateSecretChange, also marked their changesets as AshAuthentication interactions, which the standard AshAuthenticationInteraction policy bypass lets through. A policy limiting setup and confirm_setup to the actor's own record therefore never ran when an application exposed those actions by record key, and a direct setup call on another user's record returned that user's pending secret and setup token. This issue affects ash_authentication: from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118505 | 1 Team-alembic | 1 Ash Authentication | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in team-alembic ash_authentication allows an unauthenticated attacker to guess passwords and one-time passwords without limit. The password, magic link and OTP strategies enforce brute_force_strategy by adding a preparation only to the actions they generate. When the resource defines one of those actions itself, the strategy uses it as written and nothing checked that it carried the preparation, so the setting compiled and applied no limit. The generators produce exactly this: mix ash_authentication.install writes sign_in_with_password, request_password_reset_token and request_magic_link, mix ash_authentication.upgrade then adds brute_force_strategy to those strategies, and mix ash_authentication.add_strategy.otp writes its OTP actions without the preparation. Separately, with registration_enabled? true the OTP sign-in is a create action, which preparations do not run on, so brute_force_strategy {:preparation, module} never applied to it. This issue affects ash_authentication: from 5.0.0-rc.4 before 5.0.0-rc.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114185 | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WPVibes AnyWhere Elementor anywhere-elementor allows Stored XSS.This issue affects AnyWhere Elementor: from n/a through 1.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113937 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111211 | 2 Django Project, Djangoproject | 2 Django, Django | 2026-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3, 6.0 before 6.0.10, and 5.2 before 5.2.19. `django.contrib.gis.forms.widgets.BaseGeometryWidget.deserialize()`, used by `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField`, does not escape invalid submitted values before logging them, which allows remote attackers to inject or forge log entries via a crafted geometry value. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Aaron chen for reporting this issue. | ||||