Export limit exceeded: 425979 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1874 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1530 | 1 Redhat | 4 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Maintenance and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in fog-kubevirt. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack due to disabled certificate validation. This enables the attacker to intercept and potentially alter sensitive communications between Satellite and OpenShift, resulting in information disclosure and data integrity compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24734 | 2 Apache, Apache Tomcat | 3 Tomcat, Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat | 2026-04-16 | 7.4 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat. When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed. This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native: from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected. Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue. Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3822 | 1 Taipower | 1 Taipower App | 2026-04-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| Taipower APP for Andorid developed by Taipower has an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. When establishing an HTTPS connection with the server, the application fails to verify the server-side TLS/SSL certificate. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attackers to exploit the vulnerability to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack to read and tamper with network packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27221 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30307, 24.001.30308, 25.001.21265 and earlier are affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to spoof the identity of a signer. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0862 | 2 Apple, Microsoft | 10 Macos, Internet Explorer, Office and 7 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The (1) CertGetCertificateChain, (2) CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy, and (3) WinVerifyTrust APIs within the CryptoAPI for Microsoft products including Microsoft Windows 98 through XP, Office for Mac, Internet Explorer for Mac, and Outlook Express for Mac, do not properly verify the Basic Constraints of intermediate CA-signed X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack for SSL sessions, as originally reported for Internet Explorer and IIS. | ||||
| CVE-2005-3170 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 2000 | 2026-04-16 | 5 Medium |
| The LDAP client on Microsoft Windows 2000 before Update Rollup 1 for SP4 accepts certificates using LDAP Secure Sockets Layer (LDAPS) even when the Certificate Authority (CA) is not trusted, which could allow attackers to trick users into believing that they are accessing a trusted site. | ||||
| CVE-2003-1229 | 2 Oracle, Sun | 3 Jre, Java Web Start, Jsse | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files. | ||||
| CVE-2019-12098 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Heimdal Project and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Heimdal and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| In the client side of Heimdal before 7.6.0, failure to verify anonymous PKINIT PA-PKINIT-KX key exchange permits a man-in-the-middle attack. This issue is in krb5_init_creds_step in lib/krb5/init_creds_pw.c. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21228 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Local | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Improper certificate validation in Azure Local allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52919 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In Yealink RPS before 2025-05-26, the certificate upload function does not properly validate certificate content, potentially allowing invalid certificates to be uploaded. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54147 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Altair is a GraphQL client for all platforms. Prior to version 8.0.5, Altair GraphQL Client's desktop app does not validate HTTPS certificates allowing a man-in-the-middle to intercept all requests. Any Altair users on untrusted networks (eg. public wifi, malicious DNS servers) may have all GraphQL request and response headers and bodies fully compromised including authorization tokens. The attack also allows obtaining full access to any signed-in Altair GraphQL Cloud account and replacing payment checkout pages with a malicious website. Version 8.0.5 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42186 | 2026-04-15 | 2.8 Low | ||
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by an insecure protocol support. The application can allow improper handling of SSL certificates validation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13956 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 6.7 Medium |
| SSL Verification Bypass vulnerabilities exist in ASPECT if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61778 | 1 Akkadotnet | 1 Akka.net | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Akka.NET is a .NET port of the Akka project from the Scala / Java community. In all versions of Akka.Remote from v1.2.0 to v1.5.51, TLS could be enabled via our `akka.remote.dot-netty.tcp` transport and this would correctly enforce private key validation on the server-side of inbound connections. Akka.Remote, however, never asked the outbound-connecting client to present ITS certificate - therefore it's possible for untrusted parties to connect to a private key'd Akka.NET cluster and begin communicating with it without any certificate. The issue here is that for certificate-based authentication to work properly, ensuring that all members of the Akka.Remote network are secured with the same private key, Akka.Remote needed to implement mutual TLS. This was not the case before Akka.NET v1.5.52. Those who run Akka.NET inside a private network that they fully control or who were never using TLS in the first place are now affected by the bug. However, those who use TLS to secure their networks must upgrade to Akka.NET V1.5.52 or later. One patch forces "fail fast" semantics if TLS is enabled but the private key is missing or invalid. Previous versions would only check that once connection attempts occurred. The second patch, a critical fix, enforces mutual TLS (mTLS) by default, so both parties must be keyed using the same certificate. As a workaround, avoid exposing the application publicly to avoid the vulnerability having a practical impact on one's application. However, upgrading to version 1.5.52 is still recommended by the maintainers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4062 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Hualai Xiaofang iSC5 3.2.2_112 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper certificate validation. The attack may be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261788. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47258 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| 2N Access Commander version 2.1 and prior is vulnerable in default settings to Man In The Middle attack due to not verifying certificates of 2N edge devices. 2N has currently released an updated version 3.3 of 2N Access Commander, with added Certificate Fingerprint Verification. Since version 2.2 of 2N Access Commander (released in February 2022) it is also possible to enforce TLS certificate validation.It is recommended that all customers update 2N Access Commander to the latest version and use one of two mentioned practices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10495 | 1 Lenovo | 5 App Store, Browser, Legion Zone and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A potential vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo PC Manager, Lenovo App Store, Lenovo Browser, and Lenovo Legion Zone client applications that, under certain conditions, could allow an attacker on the same logical network to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70043 | 1 Ayms | 1 Node-to | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue pertaining to CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation was discovered in Ayms node-To master. The application disables TLS/SSL certificate validation by setting 'rejectUnauthorized': false in TLS socket options | ||||
| CVE-2024-31955 | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in Samsung eMMC with KLMAG2GE4A and KLM8G1WEMB firmware. Code bypass through Electromagnetic Fault Injection allows an attacker to successfully authenticate and write to the RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) area without possessing secret information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48393 | 1 Eaton | 1 G4 Pdu | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center. | ||||