Export limit exceeded: 21829 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (122 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8635 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-21 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9135 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8056 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13445 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (confidentiality breach). In overwrite mode, the attacker can replace victim file contents with arbitrary data (integrity breach). This breaks the storage ownership boundary between users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8476 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7872 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files including the JWT signing key and forge authentication tokens for any user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14499 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9103 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN configuration is enabled (enabled by default), which may allow an unauthenticated network attacker to obtain full administrative access. Additionally, permissive cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) settings may allow tokens to be exposed to unintended origins, increasing the risk of unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8859 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-20 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9202 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE endpoints, bypassing the need for AUTO_LOGIN. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8481 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-17 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55255 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-07-07 | 8.4 High |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.1, an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7873 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7871 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows users with Redis access to execute arbitrary code with full application privileges, compromising all secrets, data, and system integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10134 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 10 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata endpoints, laterally move to other tenants on the same Langflow instance, and Establish persistence by modifying the public flow's `tool_code` so normal `/api/v1/build/...` calls by any user re-execute attacker code at each build. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10129 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10564 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The legacy RSSReaderComponent in rss.py and SearXNG component in searxng.py make unvalidated HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs, bypassing SSRF protections introduced in version 1.9.3. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to access internal resources including cloud metadata services (AWS/Azure/GCP IMDS), potentially exfiltrating IAM credentials and enumerating internal networks. The vulnerability can also be triggered through prompt injection in agentic workflows due to tool_mode=True exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10560 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a missing authentication vulnerability in /api/v1/build_public_tmp/ endpoints that allows an unauthenticated attacker to read build event data or cancel jobs using a valid job identifier, resulting in information disclosure and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10140 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 voice mode contains improper shared-state handling that allows reuse of API clients across tenant boundaries. An authenticated attacker can manipulate cache state to cause requests from other users to be processed using incorrect upstream API credentials, leading to cross-tenant billing and accountability misattribution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10546 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-07-01 | 7.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL component ( src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data_source/url.py ) due to a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can be exploited via DNS rebinding. | ||||