| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Citrix Presentation Server Client for Windows before 10.200 does not clear "credential information" from process memory in unspecified circumstances, which might allow local users to gain privileges. |
| The Citrix EPA ActiveX control (aka the "endpoint checking control" or CCAOControl Object) before 4.5.0.0 in npCtxCAO.dll in Citrix Access Gateway Standard Edition before 4.5.5 and Advanced Edition before 4.5 HF1 allows remote attackers to download and execute arbitrary programs onto a client system. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the client components in Citrix Access Gateway Standard Edition before 4.5.5 and Advanced Edition before 4.5 HF1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. |
| The Secure Gateway service in Citrix Secure Gateway 3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via an unspecified request. |
| xend in Xen 3.3.0 does not properly restrict a guest VM's write access within the /local/domain xenstore directory tree, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service and possibly have unspecified other impact by writing to (1) console/tty, (2) console/limit, or (3) image/device-model-pid. NOTE: this issue exists because of erroneous set_permissions calls in the fix for CVE-2008-4405. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix Presentation Server Client for Windows before 10.0 allows remote web sites to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, related to the implementation of ICA connectivity through proxy servers. |
| Untrusted search path vulnerability in Citrix MetaFrame Presentation Server allows local users to gain privileges via a malicious icabar.exe placed in the search path. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the on-line help feature in Citrix Web Interface 2.0 and earlier, and NFuse, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the XenAPI HTTP interfaces in Citrix XenServer Express, Standard, and Enterprise Edition 4.1.0; Citrix XenServer Dell Edition (Express and Enterprise) 4.1.0; and HP integrated Citrix XenServer (Select and Enterprise) 4.1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix Online Plug-in for Windows 11.0.x before 11.0.150 and 11.x before 11.2, Online Plug-in for Mac before 11.0, Receiver for iPhone before 1.0.3, and ICA Java, Mac, UNIX, and Windows Clients for XenApp and XenDesktop allows remote attackers to impersonate the SSL/TLS server and bypass authentication via a crafted certificate, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3555. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in SecureICA and ICA Basic encryption of Citrix Presentation Server 4.5 and earlier, Access Essentials 2.0 and earlier, and Desktop Server 1.0 can cause clients to use weaker encryption settings than configured by the administrator, which might allow attackers to bypass intended restrictions. |
| dne2000.sys in Citrix Deterministic Network Enhancer (DNE) 2.21.7.233 through 3.21.7.17464, as used in (1) Cisco VPN Client, (2) Blue Coat WinProxy, and (3) SafeNet SoftRemote and HighAssurance Remote, allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted DNE_IOCTL DeviceIoControl request to the \\.\DNE device interface. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix XenApp (formerly Presentation Server) 4.5 Feature Pack 1 and earlier, Presentation Server 4.0, and Access Essentials 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 allows local users to gain privileges via unknown attack vectors related to creating an unspecified file. NOTE: this might be the same issue as CVE-2008-3485, but the vendor advisory is too vague to be certain. |
| GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. |
| GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. |
| Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a SAML IDP leading to memory overread |
| Citrix NetScaler SD-WAN devices through v9.1.2.26.561201 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands as root via a CGISESSID cookie. On CloudBridge (the former name of NetScaler SD-WAN) devices, the cookie name was CAKEPHP rather than CGISESSID. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix Access Gateway with Advanced Access Control (AAC) 4.2 before 20060914, when AAC is configured to use LDAP authentication, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Citrix NFuse 1.6 and earlier does not quote results from the getLastError method, which allows remote attackers to execute script in other clients via the NFuse_Application parameter to (1) launch.jsp or (2) launch.asp. |
| CITRIX Metaframe 1.8 logs the Client Address (IP address) that is provided by the client instead of obtaining it from the packet headers, which allows clients to spoof their public IP address, e.g. through Network Address Translation (NAT). |
