| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in API features in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.9) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCus95884. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SOAP API endpoints of the web-services directory in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.9) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create administrative accounts, aka Bug ID CSCus97494. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Shopizer 1.1.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) modify customer settings or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change (2) customer passwords, (3) shop configuration, or (4) product details, as demonstrated by (5) modify a product's price via a crafted request to central/catalog/saveproduct.action or (6) creating a product review via a crafted request to shop/product/createReview.action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web server on Siemens SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU devices with firmware before 4.1.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SearchBlox before 8.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Bagisto before v.1.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML script. |
| CSRF tokens are generated using math/rand, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator, allowing an attacker to predict values and bypass CSRF protections with relatively few requests. |
| A vulnerability was found in mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 up to d4836f6b49cd0ac79a4021b15ce99ff7229d4694 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack, which could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for the web UI of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user, such as deleting users from the device. |
| Broken Access Control vulnerability in Nickolas Bossinas WordPress File Upload allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WordPress File Upload: from n/a through 4.24.7. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Opsview before 4.4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web management interface in InterSect Alliance Snare Agent 3.2.3 and earlier on Solaris, Snare Agent 3.1.7 and earlier on Windows, Snare Agent 1.5.0 and earlier on Linux and AIX, Snare Agent 1.4 and earlier on IRIX, Snare Epilog 1.5.3 and earlier on Windows, and Snare Epilog 1.2 and earlier on UNIX allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the password or (2) change the listening port. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Comment Moderation module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-1.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that publish comments. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Noma component in GroundWork Monitor Enterprise 6.7.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that (1) store XSS sequences or (2) delete entries. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Support Incident Tracker (aka SiT!) before 3.65 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change administrator email, add a new administrator, or insert arbitrary script via (1) user_profile_edit.php or (2) user_add.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the apache2-slms package in SUSE Lifecycle Management Server (SLMS) 1.0 on SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE) 11 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via vectors related to improper parameter quoting. NOTE: some sources report that this is a vulnerability in a product named "Apache SLMS," but that is incorrect. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the retrospam component in wp-admin/options-discussion.php in WordPress 2.0.11 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that move comments to the moderation list. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in login.jsp in Tyler Technologies TaxWeb 3.13.3.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change a password. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the order-management functionality in the Ubercart module 5.x before 5.x-1.9 and 6.x before 6.x-2.1 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP Insight Software Installer for Windows before 6.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-1971. |