Export limit exceeded: 339475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 339475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 339475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 339475 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (20907 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-8594 | 2 Autodesk, Microsoft | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL file when parsed in libodxdll.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8592 | 2 Autodesk, Microsoft | 13 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 10 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPART file when parsed in AcTranslators.exe through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8591 | 2 Autodesk, Microsoft | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted 3DM file when parsed in AcTranslators.exe through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Heap-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8589 | 2 Autodesk, Microsoft | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file when parsed in odxsw_dll.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8588 | 2 Autodesk, Microsoft | 12 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 9 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file when parsed in odxsw_dll.dll through Autodesk AutoCAD can force a Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, write sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7992 | 1 Autodesk | 14 Advance Steel, Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel and 11 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWG file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD and certain AutoCAD-based products, can force a Stack-based Buffer Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7673 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Navisworks, Navisworks Freedom, Navisworks Manage and 1 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed in w3dtk.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force a Heap-based Buffer Overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7670 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Navisworks, Navisworks Freedom, Navisworks Manage and 1 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed in w3dtk.dll through Autodesk Navisworks, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37008 | 1 Autodesk | 2 Revit, Revit Lt | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWG file, when parsed in Revit, can force a stack-based buffer overflow. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12669 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Navisworks, Navisworks Freedom, Navisworks Manage and 1 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can be used to cause a Heap-based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41147 | 1 Mackron | 1 Miniaudio | 2025-08-26 | 7.7 High |
| An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the ma_dr_flac__decode_samples__lpc functionality of Miniaudio miniaudio v0.11.21. A specially crafted .flac file can lead to memory corruption. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12194 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Navisworks, Navisworks Freedom, Navisworks Manage and 1 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12179 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Navisworks, Navisworks Freedom, Navisworks Manage and 1 more | 2025-08-26 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted DWFX file, when parsed through Autodesk Navisworks, can be used to cause a Heap-based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11268 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Revit | 2025-08-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or could lead to an arbitrary memory leak. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20001 | 1 High-logic | 1 Fontcreator | 2025-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in High-Logic FontCreator 15.0.0.3015. A specially crafted font file can trigger this vulnerability which can lead to disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker needs to trick the user into opening the malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49350 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2025-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 11.1.0 through 11.1.4.7, 11.5.0 through 11.5.9 and 12.1.0 through 12.1.1 is vulnerable to a denial of service as the server may crash under certain conditions with a specially crafted query. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55398 | 1 Asn1c Project | 1 Asn1c | 2025-08-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in mouse07410 asn1c thru 0.9.29 (2025-03-20) - a fork of vlm asn1c. In UPER (Unaligned Packed Encoding Rules), asn1c-generated decoders fail to enforce INTEGER constraints when the bound is positive and exceeds 32 bits in length, potentially allowing incorrect or malicious input to be processed. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31416 | 1 Eaton | 1 Foreseer Electrical Power Monitoring System | 2025-08-26 | 5.6 Medium |
| The Eaton Foreseer software provides multiple customizable input fields for the users to configure parameters in the tool like alarms, reports, etc. Some of these input fields were not checking the length and bounds of the entered value. The exploit of this security flaw by a bad actor may result in excessive memory consumption or integer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0753 | 1 Ecava | 1 Integraxor | 2025-08-26 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the SCADA server in Ecava IntegraXor before 4.1.4390 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (system crash) by triggering access to DLL code located in the IntegraXor directory. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9448 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2025-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with Traffic Policies configured the vulnerability will cause received untagged packets not to hit Traffic Policy rules that they are expected to hit. If the rule was to drop the packet, the packet will not be dropped and instead will be forwarded as if the rule was not in place. This could lead to packets being delivered to unexpected destinations. | ||||