| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The implementation of Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) in WebKit, as used in Apple Safari before 4.0.4 and Google Chrome before 3.0.195.33, includes certain custom HTTP headers in the OPTIONS request during cross-origin operations with preflight, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a crafted web page. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Web Wiz Forum 9.5 allows remote attackers to log out a user via a link or IMG tag to log_off_user.asp. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PHParanoid before 0.5 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as authenticated users via unknown vectors related to private messages. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in cmd.cgi in (1) Nagios 3.0.5 and (2) op5 Monitor before 4.0.1 allows remote attackers to send commands to the Nagios process, and trigger execution of arbitrary programs by this process, via unspecified HTTP requests. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index.php in VigileCMS 1.4 allows remote attackers to change the admin password via certain parameters to the changepass module. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Planetluc RateMe 1.3.3 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as other users via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the balancer-manager in mod_proxy_balancer for Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. |
| ftpd in OpenBSD 4.3, FreeBSD 7.0, NetBSD 4.0, Solaris, and possibly other operating systems interprets long commands from an FTP client as multiple commands, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and execute arbitrary FTP commands via a long ftp:// URI that leverages an existing session from the FTP client implementation in a web browser. |
| ProFTPD 1.3.1 interprets long commands from an FTP client as multiple commands, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and execute arbitrary FTP commands via a long ftp:// URI that leverages an existing session from the FTP client implementation in a web browser. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the "My Account" feature in PHPList Integration module 5 before 5.x-1.2 and 6 before 6.x-1.1 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users via vectors related to (1) subscribing or (2) unsubscribing to mailing lists. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in admin/agent_edit.asp in PollPro 3.0 allows remote attackers to create or modify accounts as administrators via the username, password, and name parameters. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the User Protect module 5.x before 5.x-1.4 and 6.x before 6.x-1.3, a module for Drupal, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete the editing protection of a user or (2) delete a certain type of administrative-bypass rule. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Claroline before 1.8.10 allows remote attackers to change passwords, related to lack of a requirement for the previous password. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the administration interface in Cisco IronPort Encryption Appliance 6.2.4 before 6.2.4.1.1, 6.2.5, 6.2.6, 6.2.7 before 6.2.7.7, 6.3 before 6.3.0.4, and 6.5 before 6.5.0.2; and Cisco IronPort PostX 6.2.1 before 6.2.1.1 and 6.2.2 before 6.2.2.3; allows remote attackers to execute commands and modify appliance preferences as arbitrary users via a logout action. |
| The Events Manager – Calendar, Bookings, Tickets, and more! plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify booking statuses via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| eladmin v2.7 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the DatabaseController.java component. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.87 does not have authorisation in various AJAX actions, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them and perform unauthorised actions such as deleting entries. The plugin also lacks CSRF checks in some places which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as deleting entries. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.94 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as editing entries, and we consider it a medium risk. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wprio Table Block by RioVizual allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Table Block by RioVizual: from n/a through 2.1.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Administrator Z: from n/a through 2025.03.04. |
