Export limit exceeded: 377388 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377388 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-68195 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mt76: mt7615: drop TXRX_NOTIFY on non-mmio buses PKT_TYPE_TXRX_NOTIFY is an mmio-only event, but mt7615_rx_check() and mt7615_queue_rx_skb() dispatch it to mt7615_mac_tx_free() on every bus. mt7615_mac_tx_free() cleans the DMA tx queues with mt76_queue_tx_cleanup(), which calls queue_ops->tx_cleanup(). Only the mmio queue ops implement that callback; on the mt7663 USB and SDIO buses it is NULL, so a TXRX_NOTIFY there calls a NULL pointer in the RX worker. Same defect as the mt7921 and mt7925 patches in this series. Drop the event on non-mmio buses via mt76_is_mmio(), as in commit 5683e1488aa9 ("wifi: mt76: connac: do not check WED status for non-mmio devices"). | ||||
| CVE-2026-21073 | 1 Samsung Mobile | 1 Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-08-10 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in Galaxy Themes prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to launch arbitrary activity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21067 | 1 Samsung Mobile | 1 Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-08-10 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in libsmsd.so prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6788 | 1 Watchguard | 3 Agent, Single Watchguard Agent, Watchguard Agent | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Using Malicious Files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40512 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6787 | 1 Watchguard | 3 Agent, Single Watchguard Agent, Watchguard Agent | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Inclusion of Code in Existing Process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35006 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35005 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22653 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22654 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22655 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22656 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22657 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22658 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22652 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22651 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35028 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35027 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35026 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34423 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||