Export limit exceeded: 16668 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (722 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-26402 | 1 Intel | 1 Npu Drivers | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) NPU Drivers within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41232 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Spring Security Aspects may not correctly locate method security annotations on private methods. This can cause an authorization bypass. Your application may be affected by this if the following are true: * You are using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) and spring-security-aspects, and * You have Spring Security method annotations on a private method In that case, the target method may be able to be invoked without proper authorization. You are not affected if: * You are not using @EnableMethodSecurity(mode=ASPECTJ) or spring-security-aspects, or * You have no Spring Security-annotated private methods | ||||
| CVE-2025-59033 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows, Windows 10, Windows 11 and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| The Microsoft vulnerable driver block list is implemented as Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) policy. Entries that specify only the to-be-signed (TBS) part of the code signer certificate are properly blocked, but entries that specify the signing certificate's TBS hash along with a 'FileAttribRef' qualifier (such as file name or version) may not be blocked, whether hypervisor-protected code integrity (HVCI) is enabled or not. NOTE: The vendor disputes this CVE ID assignment and states that the driver blocklist is intended for use with HVCI. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14095 | 2 Microsoft, Radiometer | 7 Windows, Abl800 Basic Analyzer, Abl800 Flex Analyzer and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| A "Privilege boundary violation" vulnerability is identified affecting multiple Radiometer Products. Exploitation of this vulnerability gives a user with physical access to the analyzer, the possibility to gain unauthorized access to functionalities outside the restricted environment. The vulnerability is due to weakness in the design of access control implementation in application software. Other related CVE's are CVE-2025-14096 & CVE-2025-14097. Affected customers have been informed about this vulnerability. This CVE is being published to provide transparency. Required configuration for Exposure: Physical access to the analyzer is needed. Temporary work Around: Only authorized people can physically access the analyzer. Permanent solution: Local Radiometer representatives will contact all affected customers to discuss a permanent solution. Exploit Status: Researchers have provided working proof-of-concept. Radiometer is not aware of any publicly available exploit at the time of publication. Note: CVSS score 6.8 when underlying OS is Windows 7 or Windows XP Operating systems and CVSS score 5.7 when underlying OS is Windows 8 or Windows 10 operating systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3114 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Code Execution via Malicious Files: Attackers can create specially crafted files with embedded code that may execute without adequate security validation, potentially leading to system compromise. Sandbox Bypass Vulnerability: A flaw in the TERR security mechanism allows attackers to bypass sandbox restrictions, enabling the execution of untrusted code without appropriate controls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11734 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability was found in Keycloak that could allow an administrative user with the right to change realm settings to disrupt the service. This action is done by modifying any of the security headers and inserting newlines, which causes the Keycloak server to write to a request that has already been terminated, leading to the failure of said request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21081 | 2026-04-15 | 4.5 Medium | ||
| Protection mechanism failure for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37124 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hp | 2 Edgeconnect Enterprise, Arubaos | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the HPE Aruba Networking SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass firewall protections. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to route potentially harmful traffic through the internal network, leading to unauthorized access or disruption of services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38660 | 2026-04-15 | 3.8 Low | ||
| Protection mechanism failure in the SPP for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processor family (E-Core) may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24980 | 1 Intel | 1 Xeon Processors | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in some 3rd, 4th, and 5th Generation Intel(R) Xeon(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29864 | 2 Estsoft, Microsoft | 2 Alzip, Windows | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in ESTsoft ALZip on Windows allows SmartScreen bypass.This issue affects ALZip: from 12.01 before 12.29. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15618 | 1 Mock | 2 Business::onlinepayment::storedtransaction, Business\ | 2026-04-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| Business::OnlinePayment::StoredTransaction versions through 0.01 for Perl uses an insecure secret key. Business::OnlinePayment::StoredTransaction generates a secret key by using a MD5 hash of a single call to the built-in rand function, which is unsuitable for cryptographic use. This key is intended for encrypting credit card transaction data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5900 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Policy bypass in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to bypass of multi-download protections via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-5903 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-34208 | 1 Nyariv | 1 Sandboxjs | 2026-04-10 | 10 Critical |
| SandboxJS is a JavaScript sandboxing library. Prior to 0.8.36, SandboxJS blocks direct assignment to global objects (for example Math.random = ...), but this protection can be bypassed through an exposed callable constructor path: this.constructor.call(target, attackerObject). Because this.constructor resolves to the internal SandboxGlobal function and Function.prototype.call is allowed, attacker code can write arbitrary properties into host global objects and persist those mutations across sandbox instances in the same process. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.36. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0681 | 1 Miniorange | 1 Page Restriction | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Page Restriction WordPress (WP) – Protect WP Pages/Post plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.4. This is due to the plugin not properly restricting access to pages via the REST API when a page has been made private. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view protected pages. The vendor has decided that they will not implement REST API protection on posts and pages and the restrictions will only apply to the front-end of the site. The vendors solution was to add notices throughout the dashboard and recommends installing the WordPress REST API Authentication plugin for REST API coverage. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0682 | 1 Theandystratton | 2 Page Restrict, Pagerestrict | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Page Restrict plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.5. This is due to the plugin not properly restricting access to posts via the REST API when a page has been made private. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view protected posts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0680 | 1 Wpexpertdeveloper | 1 Wp Private Content Plus | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Private Content Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.6. This is due to the plugin not properly restricting access to posts via the REST API when a page has been made private. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view protected posts. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0085 | 1 Wpmet | 1 Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Metform Elementor Contact Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to reCaptcha Bypass in versions up to, and including, 3.2.1. This is due to insufficient server side checking on the captcha value submitted during a form submission. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass Captcha restrictions and for attackers to utilize bots to submit forms. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13794 | 1 Wpplugins | 1 Hide My Wp Ghost | 2026-04-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Ghost (Hide My WP Ghost) – Security & Firewall plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Login Page Dislcosure in all versions up to, and including, 5.3.02. This is due to the plugin not properly restricting the /wp-register.php path. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to discover the hidden login page location. | ||||