| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Inadequate encryption strength in SSL in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to potentially bypass web origin policy via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| The LaserGest mobile application encrypts stored assistance portal credentials with a hardcoded AES key and IV, allowing an attacker with access to the application package to recover them in cleartext. |
| The RSA cryptographic
key material, including a private key and public key, is embedded within the GV-Access application package. Because Android applications can be extracted and
reverse engineered, storing private cryptographic keys directly inside the
client application may allow an attacker to recover the keys and potentially
use them to impersonate the application, decrypt protected data, or generate
unauthorized cryptographic operations. |
| An
API key is hardcoded and retrievable from the GV-Face package. Since
Android applications can be reverse engineered, embedding sensitive API
credentials directly in the client application may allow unauthorized users to
extract and misuse the key. |
| The RSA cryptographic key material, including a private key and public key, is
embedded within the application package. Because Android applications can
be extracted and reverse engineered, storing private cryptographic keys
directly inside the client application may allow an attacker to recover the
keys and potentially use them to impersonate the application, decrypt protected
data, or generate unauthorized cryptographic operations. |
| The RSA cryptographic key
material, including a private key and public key, is embedded within the GV-Cloud application package. Because Android applications can be extracted and
reverse engineered, storing private cryptographic keys directly inside the
client application may allow an attacker to recover the keys and potentially
use them to impersonate the application, decrypt protected data, or generate
unauthorized cryptographic operations. |
| INDOTALENT WHMS (Asp.Net-Core-Inventory-Order-Management-System) before 10.20261109 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability caused by a hard-coded JWT signing key, issuer and audience in appsettings.json. Unauthenticated remote attackers can forge tokens for any user ID and role that the Tokens/DI.cs validator trusts, gaining administrator access to the entire API. |
| Kubero 3.0.0 through 3.1.1 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge administrative JWTs by using a hardcoded fallback signing secret when JWT_SECRET is unset. Attackers can sign tokens with arbitrary role, userGroups and permissions claims, which JwtStrategy.validate() trusts without a database lookup, to take control of pipelines, applications, users and API tokens. |
| Embedded private keys protected by a shared password can be used to sign practitioner assertions for arbitrary practitioner identifiers, enabling unauthorized practitioner token requests. |
| Shared cryptographic services use fixed vendor-wide secrets, deterministic IVs, null salts, and reversible transformations to protect credentials, IPC data, configuration values, and clinical fields. |
| IBM Guardium Key Lifecycle Manager 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.2, 4.2.1, 5.0, and 5.1 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a weak cryptographic algorithm. |
| The Magistra software uses weak custom encryption, relies on an outdated compression algorithm to protect the database, and contains embedded secrets. |
| A flaw was found in GnuTLS. The Minerva attack is a cryptographic vulnerability that exploits deterministic behavior in systems like GnuTLS, leading to side-channel leaks. In specific scenarios, such as when using the GNUTLS_PRIVKEY_FLAG_REPRODUCIBLE flag, it can result in a noticeable step in nonce size from 513 to 512 bits, exposing a potential timing side-channel. |
| IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded cryptographic key. |
| IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded cryptographic key. |
| Quest Foglight for Databases EncryptionUtil Hardcoded Encyption Key Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Quest Foglight for Databases. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the symmetricDecrypt method. The issue results from the use of a hard-coded cryptographic key. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-29967. |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 may allow attacker to information disclosure via decrypting database dump. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.6.0, and 2.3.6.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0 through 5.2.1, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox Cloud 4.4 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted HTTP requests |
| Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability exists in the DLP on-prem extensions version 11.13.1 and earlier allows a remote attacker to decrypt credentials and evidence files. |
