| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API |
| Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs |
| Pathling is a set of tools that make it easier to use FHIR and clinical terminology within health data analytics. Prior to version 2.0.0 of Pathling Server, Pathling's typed CRUD/search/batch FHIR surface allows an authenticated caller with only coarse operation authorities to act on attacker-chosen resource families because those entrypoints do not consistently enforce the documented per-resource `read` and `write` authorities. The documented authorization model requires an operation authority (e.g. `pathling:search`) to be paired with the matching per-resource `read` or `write` authority (e.g. `pathling:read:Patient`). Delete and batch are documented to require write authority for all referenced resource types. However, typed search, update, and related handlers are annotated only with `@OperationAccess(...)` and act on the provider-selected resource type without checking the corresponding per-resource authority. This is fixed in Pathling Server 2.0.0. |
| Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API |
| A vulnerability was identified in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This impacts an unknown function of the file /mdiy/form/data/list of the component ms-mdiy. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass |
| OAuth token introspection returns metadata of tokens issued to other clients (RFC 7662 section 4 violation) |
| Missing Authorization and Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in code.gitea.io/gitea |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in an application denial-of-service. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to crash the application, leading to a denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.26.0, the validation_exception_handler in vllm/entrypoints/openai/server_utils.py converts FastAPI RequestValidationError objects with str(exc), and sanitize_message in vllm/entrypoints/utils.py does not remove traceback-style file paths, allowing unauthenticated malformed JSON requests to /v1/chat/completions, /v1/completions, /tokenize, and /detokenize to disclose the OS username, home and virtual-environment paths, Python version, internal package structure, line numbers, and endpoint handler names. This issue is fixed in version 0.26.0. |
| is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. |
| is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to add unexpected parameters to a command due to parameter injection. |
| Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in REST API Log <= 1.7.1 versions. |
| ishankportfolio is a portfolio website. Prior to version 1.0.1, contact form submissions could potentially be exposed due to improperly secured client-side database configuration and insufficient access control policies. Applications using publicly exposed database credentials or permissive database rules may allow unauthorised users to read, modify, or abuse stored form submission data. This could impact personally identifiable information (PII) submitted through the website contact form, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and messages. The issue has been patched in version 1.0.1. Users unable to upgrade immediately can reduce risk by disabling public read/write database access, rotating exposed API keys, restricting database policies to authenticated requests only, moving sensitive operations to secure backend/serverless functions, and/or monitoring database activity logs for suspicious access. |
| Customer Sensitive Data Exposure in WP Event SOlution <= 4.1.18 versions. |
| Observable response discrepancy in PostgreSQL SCRAM authentication allows an unauthenticated user to test the existence of a user via observing the SCRAM iteration count. This requires the probed user to have a non-default scram_iterations count, because the authentication challenge for a nonexistent user reports the default scram_iterations. Within major versions 16-18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, and 16.15 are affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 16 are unaffected. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| The Salon Booking System WordPress plugin before 10.30.34 does not properly validate a booking's ownership token before loading it in its booking-wizard confirmation steps, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose other customers' booking records, including personal information, by supplying a sequential booking identifier. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
