| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An unchecked return value within the AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) could allow an attacker to write to an arbitrary memory address resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution. |
| An out-of-bounds read in power management firmware by a malicious local attacker with low privileges could potentially lead to a partial loss of confidentiality and availability. |
| Improper isolation of shared resources within the CPU operation cache on Zen 2-based products could allow an attacker to corrupt instructions executed at a different privilege level, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. |
| Insufficient checking of memory buffer in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Secure OS may allow an attacker with a malicious trusted application to read/write to the ASP Secure OS kernel virtual address space, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. |
| Improper enforcement of the LFENCE serialization property may allow an attacker to bypass speculation barriers and potentially disclose sensitive information, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Incorrect use of boot service in the AMD Platform Configuration Blob (APCB) SMM driver could allow a privileged attacker with local access (Ring 0) to achieve privilege escalation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper Access Control in an on-chip debug interface could allow a privileged attacker to enable a debug interface and potentially compromise data confidentiality or integrity. |
| Use of an uninitialized variable in the ASP could allow an attacker to access leftover data from a trusted execution environment (TEE) driver, potentially leading to loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in AMD Crash Defender could allow an attacker to obtain kernel address information potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper input validation in the system management mode (SMM) could allow a privileged attacker to overwrite arbitrary memory potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution at the SMM level. |
| Failure to validate the address and size in TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) may allow a malicious x86 attacker to send malformed messages to the graphics mailbox resulting in an overlap of a TMR (Trusted Memory Region) that was previously allocated by the ASP bootloader leading to a potential loss of integrity. |
| Missing authorization in AMD RomArmor could allow an attacker to bypass ROMArmor protections during system resume from a standby state, potentially resulting in a loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Insufficient bounds checking in AMD TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) could allow an attacker with a compromised userspace to invoke a command with malformed arguments leading to out of bounds memory access, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Improper system call parameter validation in the Trusted OS may allow a malicious driver to perform mapping or unmapping operations on a large number of pages, potentially resulting in kernel memory corruption. |
| Improper key usage control in AMD Secure Processor
(ASP) may allow an attacker with local access who has gained arbitrary code
execution privilege in ASP to
extract ASP cryptographic keys, potentially resulting in loss of
confidentiality and integrity. |
| Insufficient parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader could allow an attacker with access to SPIROM upgrade to overwrite the memory, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation in the SMM communications buffer could allow a privileged attacker to perform an out of bounds read or write to SMRAM potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or integrity. |
| An out-of-bounds read in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker with access to a malicious bootloader to potentially read sensitive memory resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper isolation of shared resources on a system on a chip by a malicious local attacker with high privileges could potentially lead to a partial loss of integrity. |
| Insufficient parameter validation while allocating process space in the Trusted OS (TOS) may allow for a malicious userspace process to trigger an integer overflow, leading to a potential denial of service. |
