| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Huawei FusionManager with software V100R002C03 and V100R003C00 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a CSRF attack against the user of the web interface. |
| A vulnerability in the Device Manager web interface of Cisco Industrial Ethernet 1000 Series Switches 1.3 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection by the Device Manager web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link or visit an attacker-controlled website. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to submit arbitrary requests to an affected device via the Device Manager web interface and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc88811. |
| ZoneMinder v1.30 and v1.29, an open-source CCTV server web application, is vulnerable to CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) which allows a remote attack to make changes to the web application as the current logged in victim. If the victim visits a malicious web page, the attacker can silently and automatically create a new admin user within the web application for remote persistence and further attacks. The URL is /zm/index.php and sample parameters could include action=user uid=0 newUser[Username]=attacker1 newUser[Password]=Password1234 conf_password=Password1234 newUser[System]=Edit (among others). |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NETGEAR DGN2200 routers with firmware 10.0.0.20 through 10.0.0.50 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that perform DNS lookups via the host_name parameter to dnslookup.cgi. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2017-6334 to execute arbitrary code remotely. |
| Suricata before 3.2.1 has an IPv4 defragmentation evasion issue caused by lack of a check for the IP protocol during fragment matching. |
| Subrion CMS 4.0.5 has CSRF in admin/blocks/add/. The attacker can create any block, and can optionally insert XSS via the content parameter. |
| Huawei Tecal RH1288 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285 V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2265 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2285H V2 V100R002C00SPC111 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2268 V2 V100R002C00, Tecal RH2288 V2 V100R002C00SPC117 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2288H V2 V100R002C00SPC115 and earlier versions, Tecal RH2485 V2 V100R002C00SPC502 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V2 V100R001C02SPC109 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885 V3 V100R003C01SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal RH5885H V3 V100R003C00SPC102 and earlier versions, Tecal XH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH311 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal XH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH310 V2 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal DH320 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH620 V2 V100R001C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal DH621 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal DH628 V2 V100R001C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH620 V2 V100R002C00SPC107 and earlier versions, Tecal BH621 V2 V100R002C00SPC106 and earlier versions, Tecal BH622 V2 V100R002C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal BH640 V2 V100R002C00SPC108 and earlier versions, Tecal CH121 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH140 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions, Tecal CH220 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH221 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH222 V100R002C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH240 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V100R001C00SPC180 and earlier versions, Tecal CH242 V3 V100R001C00SPC110 and earlier versions have a CSRF vulnerability. The products do not use the Token mechanism for web access control. When users log in to the Huawei servers and access websites containing the malicious CSRF script, the CSRF script is executed, which may cause configuration tampering and system restart. |
| CSRF in YouTube (WordPress plugin) could allow unauthenticated attacker to change any setting within the plugin |
| A vulnerability in the Web UI Application of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool through 12.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of defense against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the user's browser to perform any action authorized for that user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90280. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) vulnerability in esfadmingui in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to forge requests, if this component is configured. This includes creating new privileged credentials, resulting in privilege elevation (CWE-275). Note esfadmingui is not enabled by default. |
| Versions of Nexpose prior to 6.4.66 fail to adequately validate the source of HTTP requests intended for the Automated Actions administrative web application, and are susceptible to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in the Blacklist and Whitelist IP Wizard in init.php in the Loginizer plugin before 1.3.6 for WordPress because the HTTP Referer header is not checked. |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Zope Management Interface 4.3.7 and earlier, and Plone before 5.x. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Grails console (aka Grails Debug Console and Grails Web Console) 2.0.7, 1.5.10, and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that execute arbitrary Groovy code via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM Disposal and Governance Management for IT and IBM Global Retention Policy and Schedule Management, components of IBM Atlas Policy Suite 6.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 2000771. |
| An issue was discovered in Hanwha Techwin Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior. Multiple Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities have been identified. The flaws exist within the Redis and Apache Felix Gogo servers that are installed as part of this product. By issuing specific HTTP Post requests, an attacker can gain system level access to a remote shell session. Smart Security Manager Versions 1.5 and prior are affected by these vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities can allow for remote code execution. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SOGo before 3.1.0. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kallithea before 0.2. |
| Umbraco before 7.4.0 allows remote attackers to bypass anti-forgery security measures and conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks as demonstrated by editing user account information in the templates.asmx.cs file. |
